33-18.3 final

[numbear1]

198 total offensive points for EWU facing a highly difficult and respectable college football schedule. Oregon, UNI, Montana St., Sac St., Cal Poly, ISU.

And here come the Bears!!! :rofl: 110 total offensive points scored this season against the bumper bowling, McDonalds play-land, training wheels college football schedule! Sac St. and Davis boast identical 1-6 records this season.

42-17 final final.

 

[Bear Fan]

Your optimistic. I didn't think it would be that close!

 

[gobears2010]

198 total offensive points for EWU facing a highly difficult and respectable college football schedule. Oregon, UNI, Montana St., Sac St., Cal Poly, ISU.

And here come the Bears!!! :rofl: 110 total offensive points scored this season against the bumper bowling, McDonalds play-land, training wheels college football schedule! Sac St. and Davis boast identical 1-6 records this season.

42-17 final final.

Those stats are inaccurate. EWU has scored 247 points in six games, an average of 41.2 points per game. UNC has scored 179 points in six games, an average of 29.8 per game.

*Stephen A. Smith voice* HOWEVER, EWU has allowed 238 points in six games, an average of 39.7 points per game, while UNC has allowed just 159 points in six games, 26.5 per game.

If you're going to try to troll, at least get the stats close to right.

 

[numbear1]

198 total offensive points for EWU facing a highly difficult and respectable college football schedule. Oregon, UNI, Montana St., Sac St., Cal Poly, ISU.

And here come the Bears!!! :rofl: 110 total offensive points scored this season against the bumper bowling, McDonalds play-land, training wheels college football schedule! Sac St. and Davis boast identical 1-6 records this season.

42-17 final final.

Those stats are inaccurate. EWU has scored 247 points in six games, an average of 41.2 points per game. UNC has scored 179 points in six games, an average of 29.8 per game.

*Stephen A. Smith voice* HOWEVER, EWU has allowed 238 points in six games, an average of 39.7 points per game, while UNC has allowed just 159 points in six games, 26.5 per game.

If you're going to try to troll, at least get the stats close to right.

Maybe you should learn how to read. I stated numbers strictly for OFFENSIVE SCORES!!! Touchdowns are what you call scores. Equally with EWU not counting PAT'S, FG's, special teams or Defensive scores. That's it you moron!

 

[gobears2010]

198 total offensive points for EWU facing a highly difficult and respectable college football schedule. Oregon, UNI, Montana St., Sac St., Cal Poly, ISU.

And here come the Bears!!! :rofl: 110 total offensive points scored this season against the bumper bowling, McDonalds play-land, training wheels college football schedule! Sac St. and Davis boast identical 1-6 records this season.

42-17 final final.

Those stats are inaccurate. EWU has scored 247 points in six games, an average of 41.2 points per game. UNC has scored 179 points in six games, an average of 29.8 per game.

*Stephen A. Smith voice* HOWEVER, EWU has allowed 238 points in six games, an average of 39.7 points per game, while UNC has allowed just 159 points in six games, 26.5 per game.

If you're going to try to troll, at least get the stats close to right.

Maybe you should learn how to read. I stated numbers strictly for OFFENSIVE SCORES!!! Touchdowns are what you call scores. Equally with EWU not counting PAT'S, FG's, special teams or Defensive scores. That's it you moron!

Well, then you're just stupid. Guess what? Defensive TDs, special teams TDs, field goals, PATs, those all count the same as offensive TDs! So who gives a damn about strictly offensive TDs? You're just an idiot, troll loser and if this board was moderated worth a damn the likes of you would be banned for crap like this. Go away.

 

[McCandyman]

I agree with gobears2010, numbear1 is a troll and should just go away. All he does is spout negativity. Since he lost his house on the Houston Baptist game, I think he should crawl back into his van down by the river and chill out until basketball season, because its obvious he doesn't know jack sh*t about football. :thumbdown: :troll:

 

[numbear1]

That is true. But my point is that actual scores or teams who can score before special teams and defense will win more often. That's a simple fact and whether you like it or not it still remains true.

Defensive and special teams scores are meaningful and valid but not always the case week in and week out. These guys have averaged 5 TD's (offensively) a game. That's why they win games because they don't rely on the other units heavily. That is why UNC and fans like you who do not understand how the game is played will never be successful. Motivation for other units becomes much higher among the team when an offense continues to score. Simple as that. Meow

Offensive TD's folks. More important than mccandymans favorite picture of Collins autographed selfie hanging on his bedroom wall.

 

[Brian]

198 total offensive points for EWU facing a highly difficult and respectable college football schedule. Oregon, UNI, Montana St., Sac St., Cal Poly, ISU.

And here come the Bears!!! :rofl: 110 total offensive points scored this season against the bumper bowling, McDonalds play-land, training wheels college football schedule! Sac St. and Davis boast identical 1-6 records this season.

42-17 final final.

Those stats are inaccurate. EWU has scored 247 points in six games, an average of 41.2 points per game. UNC has scored 179 points in six games, an average of 29.8 per game.

*Stephen A. Smith voice* HOWEVER, EWU has allowed 238 points in six games, an average of 39.7 points per game, while UNC has allowed just 159 points in six games, 26.5 per game.

If you're going to try to troll, at least get the stats close to right.

Maybe you should learn how to read. I stated numbers strictly for OFFENSIVE SCORES!!! Touchdowns are what you call scores. Equally with EWU not counting PAT'S, FG's, special teams or Defensive scores. That's it you moron!

Well, then you're just stupid. Guess what? Defensive TDs, special teams TDs, field goals, PATs, those all count the same as offensive TDs! So who gives a damn about strictly offensive TDs? You're just an idiot, troll loser and if this board was moderated worth a damn the likes of you would be banned for crap like this. Go away.

Hey, I take offense to that. :sarcasm:

Anyway, if numbear1 is calling out offensive statistics (similar to how the media is calling out the Broncos offense), I don't see anything wrong with only pulling points by offense.

Last week was an epic performance by the offense so it will be interesting to see where they take it from here.

 

[numbear1]

198 total offensive points for EWU facing a highly difficult and respectable college football schedule. Oregon, UNI, Montana St., Sac St., Cal Poly, ISU.

And here come the Bears!!! :rofl: 110 total offensive points scored this season against the bumper bowling, McDonalds play-land, training wheels college football schedule! Sac St. and Davis boast identical 1-6 records this season.

42-17 final final.

Those stats are inaccurate. EWU has scored 247 points in six games, an average of 41.2 points per game. UNC has scored 179 points in six games, an average of 29.8 per game.

*Stephen A. Smith voice* HOWEVER, EWU has allowed 238 points in six games, an average of 39.7 points per game, while UNC has allowed just 159 points in six games, 26.5 per game.

If you're going to try to troll, at least get the stats close to right.

Maybe you should learn how to read. I stated numbers strictly for OFFENSIVE SCORES!!! Touchdowns are what you call scores. Equally with EWU not counting PAT'S, FG's, special teams or Defensive scores. That's it you moron!

Well, then you're just stupid. Guess what? Defensive TDs, special teams TDs, field goals, PATs, those all count the same as offensive TDs! So who gives a damn about strictly offensive TDs? You're just an idiot, troll loser and if this board was moderated worth a damn the likes of you would be banned for crap like this. Go away.

Hey, I take offense to that. :sarcasm:

Anyway, if numbear1 is calling out offensive statistics (similar to how the media is calling out the Broncos offense), I don't see anything wrong with only pulling points by offense.

Last week was an epic performance by the offense so it will be interesting to see where they take it from here.

Exactly. Somebody with some sense.

 

[mountainbear]

Well done Brian......for a minute there I was worried someone would get called a doo doo head.