Fredpurdue wrote:
"ahh, yaa... duh... most major programs are offering incoming 10th and 11th graders... maybe thats why THEY win. And maybe the thinking of spudbowl has kept ISU from being succesful. When do the Bengals start looking at local kids? What high school game did you see ISU coaches at looking at east Idaho kids, or even Idaho kids? Century or Poky games? Skyline or Hillcrest games?
Offering incoming 10 and 11th graders is happening soon. True talent can be seen now, developed over the years. Winning programs get that."
I don't think a 9th grader is ready to make a decision where to play college ball. In the 9th grade you should be worrying about pimples and where to ride your bike. I just don't like the whole athletic culture these days where kids have to play one sport year around, travel around, go to summer camps, have YouTube videos, etc. Let kids be kids. Sports should be a form of exercise and fun and a way to learn how to compete. I see parents with kids with no talent thinking their kid is going to be a college football or basketball player and pushing them when they should just let the kid be a kid. I am sure this player is a special player and a great bb player but for everyone player like these there are dozens of kids losing their childhood for their or their parents' dreams --sorry, I love sports but it doesn't rule my world and signing kids to a letter of intent crosses a boundary for me.
As for Idaho kids, the recent crop of Idaho kids playing major college basketball has been a small one. Nobody was a bigger fan of Schroeder and Kinghorn than I was (not to mention Potter, Holston, Hayes, Denkers, Wilkenson, Krahn, etc.) but again I hear parents in the community saying that their kid could play at ISU when in reality they could not play at the DI level.