Nice strategic response. Wanless didn’t show his cards, which means there could very well be something going on behind the scenes. He also didn’t immediately throw out the possible move due to associated costs.“Our official statement is we are always looking to improve our athletic program," Wanless said.
Sac State would have to upgrade to 20 sports, improve its athletic budget from $15 million to about $20 million and keep a gender-equity balance. Those seem doable, Wanless said.
Translation: “Everyone is talking about is, so why can we?” I am glad that at least Sac State admin are at least entertaining the idea of a move. This is going to be interesting to see how this all unfolds.“I try not to get overly excited about such (WAC) talk. It's a compliment to the program," Wanless said. "It's just rhetoric right now."
Unless you are a fan of a team playing in either game, no one cares.Super Hornet said:Anyone care to explain why playing in the Lysol Torlet Bowl is better than playing for a Division I National Championship? 'Cause I still don't see it....
SDHornet said:Unless you are a fan of a team playing in either game, no one cares.Super Hornet said:Anyone care to explain why playing in the Lysol Torlet Bowl is better than playing for a Division I National Championship? 'Cause I still don't see it....
Super Hornet said:Every team in a lower-tier bowl (or just about every one) LOSES money going there....
Green Cookie Monster said:Link at Sacbee is now working for the poll, lets blow this thing out of the water.
StungAlum said:Green Cookie Monster said:Link at Sacbee is now working for the poll, lets blow this thing out of the water.
It will only let you vote once. If I'm wrong let me know.
Green Cookie Monster said:Should we step up and write Gonzalez and Wanless to express our support?