Wow did I miss a lot since the AZ game. I finally logged on and caught up. unch: So it's time for me to chime in. :twocents:
Moving to Vegas is a dumbass idea. hno:
I'm pretty much in agreement with all the cons that have already been expressed. But a neutral site is not the worst idea. It would have to be centrally located and accessible. SLC? I like the idea for more than the home town feel WSU would get. It is close to the conference HQ, an NBA arena, accessible by multiple means of travel, hospitable, and has the accommodations for visitors, lodging, food, alcohol arty: , entertainment, and sightseeing. It puts the revenue in a state that hosts 2 of the conference teams while NV has zero ties to our athletics. The tournament would force the regional media to pay attention (Root, Altitude, KSL), rather than let us get overlooked in a town of dreamers and tweekers (Vegas, aka Far East Los Angeles :finger: ).
Why not bring another location into this conversation, Boise. It has accessibility, a central location, hotel(s?), and an out-of-conference university that will let us pay to use their arena. Surely there's someone that would pay a sponsorship fee. And the state of Idaho also has 2 teams in the conference that could benefit from the tax revenue. There's no real home advantage there. And everyone could drive it in half-a-day or less in the worst case scenario. (Sorry UND, you don't matter because we all had to travel to your sh*#hole :butt: all season and you joined a conference that was distant.)
Driving distance to Boise:
UND - 18 hrs 56 min
NAU - 12 hrs 45 min
UNC - 11 hrs 38 min
Sac - 9 hrs 5 min
SUU - 8 hrs 15 min
MSU - 7 hrs 21 min
MT - 7 hrs 15 min
PSU - 6 hrs 43 min
EWU - 6 hrs 25 min
ID - 5 hrs 25 min
WSU - 4 hrs 30 min
ISU - 3 hrs 28 min
No, I don't really want to go to Boise, but it would sure be more beneficial to the conference than the middle of a desert. But, again, SLC has ALL the benefits. :stir:
P.S. Happy Fathers' Day :dance: :dance:
Moving to Vegas is a dumbass idea. hno:
I'm pretty much in agreement with all the cons that have already been expressed. But a neutral site is not the worst idea. It would have to be centrally located and accessible. SLC? I like the idea for more than the home town feel WSU would get. It is close to the conference HQ, an NBA arena, accessible by multiple means of travel, hospitable, and has the accommodations for visitors, lodging, food, alcohol arty: , entertainment, and sightseeing. It puts the revenue in a state that hosts 2 of the conference teams while NV has zero ties to our athletics. The tournament would force the regional media to pay attention (Root, Altitude, KSL), rather than let us get overlooked in a town of dreamers and tweekers (Vegas, aka Far East Los Angeles :finger: ).
Why not bring another location into this conversation, Boise. It has accessibility, a central location, hotel(s?), and an out-of-conference university that will let us pay to use their arena. Surely there's someone that would pay a sponsorship fee. And the state of Idaho also has 2 teams in the conference that could benefit from the tax revenue. There's no real home advantage there. And everyone could drive it in half-a-day or less in the worst case scenario. (Sorry UND, you don't matter because we all had to travel to your sh*#hole :butt: all season and you joined a conference that was distant.)
Driving distance to Boise:
UND - 18 hrs 56 min
NAU - 12 hrs 45 min
UNC - 11 hrs 38 min
Sac - 9 hrs 5 min
SUU - 8 hrs 15 min
MSU - 7 hrs 21 min
MT - 7 hrs 15 min
PSU - 6 hrs 43 min
EWU - 6 hrs 25 min
ID - 5 hrs 25 min
WSU - 4 hrs 30 min
ISU - 3 hrs 28 min
No, I don't really want to go to Boise, but it would sure be more beneficial to the conference than the middle of a desert. But, again, SLC has ALL the benefits. :stir:
P.S. Happy Fathers' Day :dance: :dance: