flyingnail said:
Just wondering what EWU is thinking about repeating the pickup of dropdown QB's versus developing our own!
A better question might be: why can't a program do both? And I'm pretty sure what they're thinking about is giving the team the best competitive edge they can to win the conference and go to the playoffs. If bringing in a QB with a ton of live experience helps meet those goals, then I have a hard time understanding why any fan of the program would be opposed to that. Some around here seem to think that BLM was the first transfer QB EWU has had. News flash, it isn't! Virtually EVERY FCS program with a pulse brings in transfers. And the fact that players don't have to sit a year to transfer from FBS to FCS is one of the few benefits of being an FCS program.
flyingnail said:
Makes me wonder WHY anybody would let themselves be recruited to EWU only to have the rug pulled out from under them for a 2yr stint by a guy who couldnt make it at the next level !! Gotta feel for those boys who have paid there dues only to have someone cut some backroom deal to get a QB who couldnt make it at the FBS level !
I understand where you are coming from when you talk about loyalty and kids that have been in the program and paid their dues, I really do. I get it. But at the same time, there's never any guarantees that a guy that's put in 3 or 4 years in the program is going to be a starter by virtue of that fact. It could be a transfer that fills a starting position, but who's to say that a Freshman doesn't come in and win a starting job. The point is, there's never any guarantees. The coaches are going to field the most competitive team on the field, period. Sometimes that means that kids that have been in the program longer than others get passed up. This is the case in virtually every competitive sport in the world. I really don't see how a player transferring in changes that fact.
Secondly, I think it's a bit short-sighted to say that the player you are talking about "couldn't make it at the FBS level". He was a pretty damn good QB his Freshman and Sophomore years, had a rough start his Junior year and then missed all of the rest of the season. Getting hurt and being passed over for a different player (coincidentally, a transfer) doesn't exactly equate to not cutting it. Just saying.
flyingnail said:
Just blows me away what some will due to win at all costs, makes you wonder what WTF they're thinking bout and how that effects the team players ! Is it really all about the W now and what it can do for me ?
Yeah, I really don't get what you're saying here at all. It's not like we're bringing in any and every FBS transfer we can.....or bringing in players with questionable work habits or personal "baggage".....or worse yet, players that have had problems with the law. EWU is a program which, historically, has brought in VERY few transfers. If you look around at our Big Sky brethren, I'd be willing to bet that we probably bring in fewer transfers than most. Similarly, if you look around the country at the elite FCS programs, chances are they have a few transfers. Nothing to see here, happens everywhere.
Bottom line, we all want to see the players that have been in the program and put in the hard work play and be successful. I mean, that's a given. The problem with the "win at all costs" theory is that we were going to have to bring at least one QB anyway. We have exactly TWO Qb's on the roster going into Spring Ball. The other is a Freshman-to-be that won't even be on campus until the Fall. So, with knowing that another QB was needed, (if for no other reason than depth), and that EWU was going to bring in another QB - why not go after the best option possible. The program needs someone with experience, and Padron has that. Is he going to be the bee's knees? Who knows, maybe he will be, maybe he won't. But the bottom line is that the best players will play, period. Competition is a good thing, it makes the team as a whole better, and I don't think the majority of the players in the program are the types to shy away from competition.
So I ask again: Why can't EWU continue to develop HS talent AND take the occasional transfer if they have the need? Why's it have to be one or the other......I don't get it.