tigersmilk
Active member
He fired a first year full time coach in his first try, and keeps a experience coach who has not gotten the job done for three years. Go figure.
this is a good point...one which i'm been ruminating on for a few days now. Havens had little to work with all season, i dont think a single lineman had more than 5 starts all season due to injuries (correct me if i'm wrong on this). you had guys rotating in and out and at different spots for 11 games. this is a difficult to situation to expect much consistency out of an o-line unit.
my point isn't that havens being released was wrong or a bad move. i just question the justification for removing havens "for lack of performance" but then to not hold amrine or strandley to the same standard..?
for the amount of money spent on defensive coaching this past year i'm am shocked (albeit not surprised) that these coaches haven't been held more accountable.
here is an interesting point i'd like to make, when looking at the conference point averages (thus far this season) we see that on average a bigsky team scores about 24 points per game (+-1/2point). that being said on average our offense put up about 13 ppg making the disparity from the average 11 points, whereas defensively we allowed 38.5 ppg making the disparity 14.5 points. interestingly we see that defense seems to be the more of our teams achilles heel.
my suggestion is that in order to win half of our conference games (which i would consider a successful season at this point) we need to bring our offense and defensive numbers to about 24 on average.
that being said with the removal of havens and jensen we will get some new coaching blood in the program for offense, this gives me hope that things might migrate closer to this magic number 24 on that side of the ball. But the big question for me is, will replacing keys on defense be enough to bring that number 38 down to 24?