My take:
APR has crushed this program. It honestly might have been easier to blow it up and start over from scratch, if only because of the restrictions. Think of the great players from the 2001-2005 era...Jared Allen, Eric Boose, Audie Attar, Eddie Johnson...guys like that could not get into the school right now under the current APR program the team has in place.
ISU has to suffer on the field in order to get the house straight regarding APR. APR is a rolling score, so Kramer and Co. need to have at least TWO ridiculously good APR years to counter act some of the ridiculously bad years he inherited. To make this make sense....if the last four APR scores are as follows:
875 875 900 950
That's an average of 900. Let's say ISU gets a 1000....you kick out the oldest score of the four-year average, so it's now this...
875 900 950 975
That's 925, and that's still below the NCAA minimum...that's why ISU has issues. The walk-on kids that have good grades being pushed to scholarship now will help get the APR up over the next two years, and that will help allow ISU to get a chance to get some of the drop-down and JC kids that might be needed to get better on the field.
Now, that's the APR issue that Cub has been trying to speak of, which for some reason fans here don't get. Tingey is giving ISU the best LONG TERM chance for football success. Eventually, he will have to change the philosophy of scheduling, because you can't play TWO FBS games and expect to have a good season...you just can't.
On the field? I haven't seen a game, but I know that UNM here was rated the 120th out of 120 FBS teams, so that's probably similar to ISU. The difference is instead of throwing it all over the field, Bob Davie brought the triple option and a run-based philosophy, which allows us to shorten the game and limit possessions. Texas beat us 45-0, but it was 17-0 at the half....each team with FOUR possessions. Four. In the last six quarters (four against Texas State, two against Boise State), we have throws FOUR passes, but we are outscoring our opponents, 60-21, rushing for about 550 yards in those six quarters. Passing is 1-for-4 for 9 yards.
When Marshall lost it's team in 1970, they came back in 1971 running the veer, which is an option run based offense, something simple and something that gives teams with tons of walk-ons a chance. Hell in real life Herman Boone did the same thing in Virginia, and the service academies use it to. The option is a great equalizer. Did Southern Utah have better athletes in Larry Lewis' first years? Hell no, but the option is a great equalizer. I think that's the fundamental flaw with what Kramer wants to do....too many possessions, too many chances for his own defense to be on the field. ISU should be running and killing the clock. It's gotten UNM to 3-3...after going 3-37 prior to Bob Davie.
ISU does need fans in the stands and fans supporting them, no matter what though....and that's up to the folks in Poky.
A long post but my $.02
FormerISUSID