LDopaPDX said:GoldenEagle said:Yes, Barriere should have run on that fourth down. However, simply comparing him to the running back that was playing QB for Idaho is wrong. That Idaho QB today went all in for one game. There is no way he can sustain that level of running attempts and stay healthy during a real season of football. It was one game and he played hard. However, Eric Barriere
is a real QB that does not take unnecessary risks and he wins games. Did Idaho win?
that's certainly fair, but I'm not asking for Barriere to run the ball 25 times or more each game. I'd settle for just the same way he attacked the field versus UC Davis... a couple of sprint-outs, a couple of zone reads, maybe an improv run or two. It just seems like there's games where he simply won't run the ball, even when it defies logic not to do so. The guy is a really good QB, but he's a really great QB when he chooses to be dynamic.
Also, just to be clear, we can comment on the offense all day, but with the exception of the first Idaho game, our offense has been winning the games. Yesterday, the problem was the defensive side. We played a team that ran a bare-bones Pop Warner offense, snap the ball to a QB, block the guy in front of you, and run wherever you see a gap. You could call it Football 101, but that would imply it was college level. This was like 1st grade level. And we couldn’t defend it. I don’t know what Idaho’s yards after contact looked like, but it felt like 50% of their yards were gained after contact. The linebackers, our strength, were poor on the whole yesterday. The DL was routinely beaten back. It just looked very soft on D.