-
Hi Guest,
We've updated the site to combine all the forums that were part of the Big Sky Fans Network into one location. This will make it easier to navigate and participate in all the discussions for each school without having to have multiple accounts, etc. We are still working out some tweaks but please let us know if you notice anything.
With the migration, in some circumstances, your username could have been merged with one of your other usernames from the other forums. If this is the case, you can request to change your username in your account details page of your profile. -
Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!
-
Guest, do want an ad free experience on BigSkyFans.com among other benefits? Upgrade your account today!
Simply click your profile name > account upgrades > BigSky Club > choose between the year long subscription (two free months) or month to month
Thanks for the continued support. Cheers!
Montana Part Deux
- Thread starter eaglesfootball
- Start date
MLEagle said:I think Montana is going to be wishing for the day that they only gave up 36 to us. With the rest we've had the last 3 weeks I think we'll be back to scoring 50+
I really hope we buck this trend we've had the past few years of coming out totally flat after a bye week. But yeah, big picture the bye is definitely more advantageous in terms of getting guys healthy. I really, really hope Forte and Moore are healthy after not playing for a month. It'd be great to go into this game with 4 or 5 healthy RB's.
mtgrizfankb
Member
GoldenEagle said:
Except JJ has ran more the last 3 games tan ever before this year. We were a pure one back team til after ewu. It will be a differ ent look for ewu. Maybe not different result but diff look
EWURanger said:MLEagle said:I think Montana is going to be wishing for the day that they only gave up 36 to us. With the rest we've had the last 3 weeks I think we'll be back to scoring 50+
I really hope we buck this trend we've had the past few years of coming out totally flat after a bye week. But yeah, big picture the bye is definitely more advantageous in terms of getting guys healthy. I really, really hope Forte and Moore are healthy after not playing for a month. It'd be great to go into this game with 4 or 5 healthy RB's.
So far this year it hasn't been a problem; we scored 52 on MSU and 56 on PSU after bye weeks. We might as well keep that trend going; gonna hang 50+ on the Griz.
But, if you peek at Ejizz after the game our success will be solely the result of horrible officiating.
GoldenEagle
Active member
datruth said:
He had two long runs against an inept defense last week. He played against probably the slowest FCS team I have ever seen today. Go ahead and run the zone read and he will be on the sidelines injured.
MLEagle said:EWURanger said:MLEagle said:I think Montana is going to be wishing for the day that they only gave up 36 to us. With the rest we've had the last 3 weeks I think we'll be back to scoring 50+
I really hope we buck this trend we've had the past few years of coming out totally flat after a bye week. But yeah, big picture the bye is definitely more advantageous in terms of getting guys healthy. I really, really hope Forte and Moore are healthy after not playing for a month. It'd be great to go into this game with 4 or 5 healthy RB's.
So far this year it hasn't been a problem; we scored 52 on MSU and 56 on PSU after bye weeks. We might as well keep that trend going; gonna hang 50+ on the Griz.
But, if you peek at Ejizz after the game our success will be solely the result of horrible officiating.
I'd take either one of those scores, but IIRC, we started off pretty flat in both of those games. Against Montana the past two years, we've come out on fire but seemed to fade out a little after getting big leads in both games. I just want to see us dominate for 60 minutes.
DefendtheRed
Active member
As usual, the offense should get their points. The dilemma is whether our defense will be up to the task of sustaining a lead for the entire game.
eaglesfootball
Active member
FormerEag said:
after watching what they did the OSU last night I'm hoping we make a showing. The good part about playing these type of games is nobody expects us to anyway.
Ultramaroon
Member
I am not worried about JJ. I think that you better be worried about Adams. I see him running for his life the whole game and getting hammered. In the last 10 quarters of football Montana has out scored their opponent 107 to 24
eaglesfootball
Active member
Ultramaroon said:
Screamin_Eagle174
Active member
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:Ultramaroon said:
You've played an offense missing its two best players, and a Pioneer League team. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Ultramaroon said:
I agree that VA may be running a lot more...he's not coming off a month of not playing like he was in the first contest. So you probably got that part right.
Montana has won four games against DI opponents with a winninng record in the last three years. Two of those wins have come in the past two weeks against an MSU team missing their best two offensive players and a non-scholarship FCS team. Not sure I'd really be puffing my chest up about that if I were you.
EWURanger said:Ultramaroon said:
I agree that VA may be running a lot more...he's not coming off a month of not playing like he was in the first contest. So you probably got that part right.
Montana has won four games against DI opponents in that last three years. Two of those wins have come in the past two weeks against an MSU team missing their best two offensive players and a non-scholarship FCS team. Not sure I'd really be puffing my chest up about that if I were you.
Put down the meth pipe Ranger. "Montana has won 4 games against D1 opponents in the last 3 years". We had 9 wins over D1 opponents last season alone (unless the BSC is no longer considered to be D1). How in the hell did we make the playoffs the this year and last with only 3 D1 wins (considering our 4th win in 3 years, according to you, came in a playoff game against non-scholarship USD)? :silly:
grizfnz said:EWURanger said:Ultramaroon said:
I agree that VA may be running a lot more...he's not coming off a month of not playing like he was in the first contest. So you probably got that part right.
Montana has won four games against DI opponents in that last three years. Two of those wins have come in the past two weeks against an MSU team missing their best two offensive players and a non-scholarship FCS team. Not sure I'd really be puffing my chest up about that if I were you.
Put down the meth pipe Ranger. "Montana has won 4 games against D1 opponents in the last 3 years". We had 9 wins over D1 opponents last season alone (unless the BSC is no longer considered to be D1). How in the hell did we make the playoffs the this year and last with only 3 D1 wins (considering our 4th win in 3 years, according to you, came in a playoff game against non-scholarship USD)? :silly:
First off, you can leave the meth references back on Egriz where they belong along with your "Montana Meth Project" advertisement that Root Sports plays 3 times a commercial break anytime the Griz are on TV. The irony here being that you might be one of the many who is too stupid to realize that Missoula County, Montana has one of the largest meth problems in the entire region...but you want to talk smack to us about some mythical meth problem? Either way, you may want to find something else, like the usual things...our stadium or flat-billed hats, because this one isn't working and just makes you look extremely dUMb.
Secondly, you are correct. I meant to type 3 opponents with a winning record (MSU x 2, Sac St., and San Diego)...4 games total. Two of those 4 wins came in the last two weeks. So, going into Cat/Griz, Montana had 2 total wins against DI programs with an above .500 record in the past three years.
