Bearsfan24
Active member
What's with running wide receiver sweeps when you're down by your own goal line and down by 14 points? Throw down field. Seriously.
Phineas J. Whoopee said:I thought we played pretty decent but were a bit overmatched. Our offense was pretty much MIA all day and I think their QB threw for like a 99% completion percentage. But still a pretty decent performance overall we are not that far off if you consider Weber at the top of the conference.
Not sure I am following you Blofeld. Help me out. All I said is we lost and the score was misleading. I thought that was the first really poor performance of the year. If you are encouraged by that performance that is concerning. The other games were close games we had a chance to win and the team was competitive. I didn't think this one was which is the point I was making.Blofeld said:Ok well if we get to play the "if" game then that means we beat Texas State, NAU, and Davis! I'll be checking the Big Sky website all day to see the standings updated! :lol:
uncfootballrules said:Guys, guys, guys - don't be fooled by this score. Just look at the stats and this was done with smoke and mirrors. We were outgained by 430 yards (570 to 140). That is an ass kicking in every meaning of the word. This score should have probably been 38-10 or something like that. Hats off to the defense for getting those turnovers to keep them out of the endzone - that is plays we need. But that is not going to happen every week. For the Bears to get another win this year it will take a lot more than that.
Don't get me wrong, I'm happy the score was close. That was a very concerning performance though. Probably the first really bad one of the year.
Ughh. You have got to be kidding me. That is possibly the most ridiculous comment I have ever heard. I won't even bother to elaborate.Blofeld said:At halftime of the ISU game they asked Hinrichs what his grade would be for Downing after 2.5 years and Hinrichs said A+ so that told me what I needed to know about next year.