-
Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts, upgrade to remove ads and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your BigSkyFans.com experience today!
@ Oregon St
- Thread starter SWeberCat02
- Start date
SWWeatherCat
Active member
Defence looks solid. Offense needs help in the form of a QB. It's disheartening that Clark throws high, throws behind, throws wobbly, and sometimes throws where he shouldn't. It's a decent showing, though, by the Weebcats.
Oh, gotta get more yardage on the punts too.
Oh, gotta get more yardage on the punts too.
Wildcat_Fan
Active member
Why not give Green a chance? Clark couldn't figure out where to throw. He is limping and lost. At least give Billy a chance!
SWeberCat02
Active member
Based on what we saw last season I don't think Green is any better. Give Leckington a shot. This team could be a QB away from being pretty good. Although running game didn't do much better.Wildcat_Fan said:
Wildcat_Fan
Active member
SWeberCat02 said:
Leckington is fine with me. I agree, A QB away from being good. OSU knew we couldn't throw so it was hard to get the run game going. But the defense looked great especially for being out on the field the whole game.
Zachatyack
New member
What happen the Hilinski kid? Heard he was in trouble or something?
He looked the biggest and biggest arm.
He looked the biggest and biggest arm.
Only score was a defensive interception?! Any injuries? Hope the offense shows up next week (mainly a stronger quarterback performance) or it's going to be a long game & maybe another long season. Not an impressive first game result, but defense side looked stronger and had some good stops. :|
DeeWildcatTailgater
Active member
We had times last year when Green was our only offense. It was not his fault we couldn't win games. He showed greatness at times. If Clark isn't productive through half of the NDSU game, put Green in. I'm certainly pulling for clark to step up though. Props to clark for playing injured. If he's not 100%, next man up.
ncaafootball
Active member
Agree on your comments on the QB. Line did a pretty good job of protecting tonight under the circumstances but if you think the QB change is going to fix everything, you are mistaken. Lots of other things have to change on offense including 5 dropped passes, lack luster play call. Wow a whole game without a screen play call. We ran one draw and and I think it was our biggest gainer on the ground.....I could go on but getting late on 3rd street in Corvallis...and way to many pubs to hit tonight.
A QB away from a good team. I am glad Jadrian owned up to the magnitude of his mistake with the interception. But you cant have a QB that throws the ball without looking. He did it after that also. I am not sure that is a problem that can be corrected. He also throws very hard with no touch which makes it harder on the receivers. I don't see them switching but I wish that freshman was up to speed. We don't need spectacular just steady.
oldmrbigsky
Member
Offensive play calling is very concerning. No way the freshman QB can help us this year either and agree that Jad was bad. We have 5 QBs! Where is Big JC QB?? Where is anyone? We need to keep up with our def which can't be on field whole damn game! I'm not giving up I'm just worried that we couldn't get an offensive series against a bad pac-12 team. This should have been a 21-20 game at worst. I'm too negative thought would wake up less so- Nope.
ncaafootball
Active member
Everyone is worrying about the Qb play. Although I don't think our Qb played well and he will need to play much better if he wants to play at the d1 level. However the number one job of any Qb is ball security and he only turned it over once so he showed that he won't blow the game but unfortunately he has not proven he can win a game. I saw no offensive scheme or hurry up pace durning the game from the weber OC. That has got to change. Way to many dropped passes that were drive killers. Also no gamers on offense no one making any plays.
