WSUfan said:At the time, the Dayton win was impressive. But how did Dayton finish the season? At 17-14, no post-season play. The win looked less and less impressive. ORU was nice, but I believe we were favored to win, lets be real, ORU isnt the best of the best. The CIT was fun, but AF was bairly a .500 team, ORU (see before), Cal Poly (expected to win), Northern Iowa, this was a great win, yes on the road, but was their team really excited about this game, did they really want to be playing in the CIT? In the Rahe era, I am talking about OOC games.. We all know he has under achieved post-season play, including the BSC tourney games (see every year but 06-07). I have waited every March to evaluate the team, and the outcome is always the same, cant beat Montana, cant beat the press, meltdowns, poor free throw shooting etc.I have serious doubts about this team, Trez has been a non factor in every game minus BYU. He got beat around by UVU's
center, and thrown to the wolves in UCLA.
You make some good points, but I wouldn't write off the Northern Iowa game as not being excited about the game. I think that argument would be better if it was the first round of the CIT, but that was the semifinal game. Their crowd was into it, and UNI doesn't lose at home very often. They had one other home loss last year before that game, and they beat final four contestant Wichita State at home.
I think one problem with the lack of quality wins is that the gap between the Big Sky and other mid/upper major conferences is growing. There's a lot more teams playing D1 college basketball then there were 15-20 yrs ago and the talent is more spread out. Since 1999 there has been more than 30 schools join DI. The Big Sky foot print doesn't have a lot of desirable places for a high level student athlete to live and the population is sparce compared to other parts of the country. Local talent is not going to elevate a big sky program to be a higher level mid major. The Big Sky's RPI continues to get worse every year and if it doesn't change, a 16 seed every year or so will not be out of the question. If the Big Sky continues on it's current course, I think it will be nearly impossible to grow Weber to an elite mid major team that consistently wins those big OOC games, regardless of who the HC is.
By the way, I always love when you come and post Bengal visitor. You and MT Jack always bring great prospective.