Grading the Season

[oldrunner]

Plus Side - The product on the floor was improved from the previous year. Maybe only slightly, but better.

Minus Side - Players seemed to have more potential than the outcomes would indicate. The team is still way too predictable on both sides of the ball. Still seem to lack defensive stoppers in the front court.

Grade - C Disappointing Season, even with lowered expectations from the previous season.

 

[Chex]

Plus Side - The product on the floor was improved from the previous year. Maybe only slightly, but better.

Minus Side - Players seemed to have more potential than the outcomes would indicate. The team is still way too predictable on both sides of the ball. Still seem to lack defensive stoppers in the front court.

Grade - C Disappointing Season, even with lowered expectations from the previous season.

Agree with your post. Since we finished 6 out of 10 teams, I would put that at 60% and give it a D or D-. It’s better than last year, but wasn’t a big improvement that was promised after the money injection and making Lillard the GM.

 

[talhadfoursteals]

D+/C-. This program is not getting better. Going from a D- to a D+ is improvement, but not what was expected with more funding. Lets be honest, in the Big Sky conference, we have some of the best facilities, history, fans, support and funding. So, who or what is the issue?!? Randy was always as good as his assistants. When he had really good assistants, that program was incredible. BUT, when he didn't, the program was workmanlike at best. Don't get me wrong Coach Rahe was an excellent coach. BUT, he wasn't Superman. He needed good help.

On the flip side, I feel there are a couple of pretty good assistant coaches on the bench. Because of them, the team is better than expected. I could be wrong. Please tell me if I am. Nevertheless, is four years enough time to get an idea of how good a coach is or will be?