UDUB206 said:Christ. Just shoot me.
Rjones61 said:Tough game. I think most of us knew that we didn't match up well with this team. The loss is always so much harder when you come that close. I would venture to say that our coaching staff did brilliantly. Their offense made clutch plays purely by out "athleting" our defense. We won't face an offense like that, that's for sure. Now, I want nothing more than UW to pull off an incredible season to make us look that much better.
Offensive MVP: Vernon Adams. It's always a little cliche to give offensive MVP to the quarterback. However, he played with incredible heart and kept drives alive by sheer force of will. Even through so much cramping, he was the biggest threat in the game. Period.
Defensive MVP: Rashad Wadood. Two plays stand out: When Rashad jumped over a defender for the tackle on a bubble screen and when Rashad chased down a speedy back to prevent the touchdown. He was in the mix and flying around and I am glad we managed to grab such a player in the off season.
kalm said:Rjones61 said:Tough game. I think most of us knew that we didn't match up well with this team. The loss is always so much harder when you come that close. I would venture to say that our coaching staff did brilliantly. Their offense made clutch plays purely by out "athleting" our defense. We won't face an offense like that, that's for sure. Now, I want nothing more than UW to pull off an incredible season to make us look that much better.
Offensive MVP: Vernon Adams. It's always a little cliche to give offensive MVP to the quarterback. However, he played with incredible heart and kept drives alive by sheer force of will. Even through so much cramping, he was the biggest threat in the game. Period.
Defensive MVP: Rashad Wadood. Two plays stand out: When Rashad jumped over a defender for the tackle on a bubble screen and when Rashad chased down a speedy back to prevent the touchdown. He was in the mix and flying around and I am glad we managed to grab such a player in the off season.
This.
We'll be fine in D.
EWUeag said:We won't face an offense as good? UW's offense was not good. Miles literally only threw it down field like 3 times. I get that they are bigger, faster, stronger, more scholarships, better looking and whatever other excuses there are, but or defense lost this game. You score 52 points and lose? Eastern, over the past 8 or more years, has always had a sub par defense compared to the offense. I don't expect the legion of boom out there. But come on, really?
UDUB206 said:Christ. Just shoot me.
UDUB206 said:IMHO, combination of below average defensive play with an above average offense and a great QB. Our secondary are all young guys mostly playing for the first time, so it was brutal watching them against a QB as accurate as VA was. He was very impressive, just dropping dimes that were great passes.
EWURanger said:UDUB206 said:IMHO, combination of below average defensive play with an above average offense and a great QB. Our secondary are all young guys mostly playing for the first time, so it was brutal watching them against a QB as accurate as VA was. He was very impressive, just dropping dimes that were great passes.
I agree. I think they are capable of playing a lot better than they did. Our offense would score a bunch on quite a few Pac-12 defenses, IMO.
Second question: Why are all the fans on your site such dicks.? Not even a "good game". Pretty disappointing from fans of the "flagship" University of Washington.
EWU98 said:Because UW fans are illetists and ignorant most of the time. especially when it comes to being gratius hosts.
EWUeag said:We won't face an offense as good? UW's offense was not good. Miles literally only threw it down field like 3 times. I get that they are bigger, faster, stronger, more scholarships, better looking and whatever other excuses there are, but or defense lost this game. You score 52 points and lose? Eastern, over the past 8 or more years, has always had a sub par defense compared to the offense. I don't expect the legion of boom out there. But come on, really?