letuknow said:
GOBIGORANGE answer the question! How many Idaho players made a impact in 2002? Issac Mitchell and???
here is a question for uknow who: what do you mean by "impact"? if i had to answer that question i would say that every idaho kid from every year since 2002 has made an impact. every kid who has walked on and played the role of practice squad for two years+ before getting aid (if ever getting any) has made an impact. these kids drive the engine of the team and make others get in line for fear of losing their spot (i’ve seen this).
here's something else i've seen, the local boys have a little something called work ethic, they have a vested interest and an inborn pride in idaho, they are willing to sacrifice the most when it comes to their program. conversely i cant begin to count how many cali juco kids (and other out-of-staters) i've heard mother eff idaho and "this hick-ass town" (most all of them do this). you think that doesn't have an effect?
how many local kids are getting in trouble (granted this hasn't happened recently)? if they do, forgiveness for a son of idaho come a lot quicker than for the perceived gangbanger!
letuknow, you think you're making a sound argument by pointing out that "idaho kids aren't going to the league or something" but you're missing the picture. recruiting local is cheap, and if it's an established tradition then it is also a lot easier. if ISU was able to fill it's roster with 50-60% idaho, how much more of the budget would be available to spend on a 4 star recruit (or however many stars is necessary)? flying a kid into pocatello direct makes for a much more positive impression than having wake up at 6am to drive back to salt lake on a sunday morning (citation for larry lewis needed).
maybe you can explain why montana can fill it's roster with 60% montana kids and win year in and year out? the truth is, in the big sky you dont need to have the biggest and fastest athletes in the nation. what you need to have are kids who will buy into the program, who are willing to sacrifice more than the guy next to him, who are willing to get down and dirty in the trenches, who will eat, sleep and breath bengal football.
obviously these are
my opinions by virtue of me having written them, that being said i don't claim to be all knowing on such matters. what i do claim is to having seen a lot of these dynamics in action. idaho kids will not be the end all of answers, but to overlook the importance of local emphasis in recruiting is a sure fire way to create problems for a program.
i fully expect a slew of counter points to the things i've said here. in preparation for this i have left a lot of detail out of my opinions so that i can address these things in with more specificity as the debate demands (and to not spend all night typing for just one post). let me stop the haters now by stating that i am not saying non-idaho kids dont have work ethic, or aren't towing the line, just that idaho kids do this better!