Atomic Eagle
Active member
We need to get some sort of points off of this TO.
-
Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts, upgrade to remove ads and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your BigSkyFans.com experience today!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Gameday Thread: Week 1 EWU 36 vs. Tennessee St 29
- Thread starter luckyintheorder
- Start date
luckyintheorder
Active member
roberson cracked my up on that one... go to the corner he's in, go to the middle and get tackled on the 1.... very humorous.
EWURanger said:Let’s get another stop here and go into the half up 10.
:thumb:
luckyintheorder
Active member
GT's been about 80% to the good despite occasional lack of accuracy on w i d e open receivers. OL is playing very well. Still would run the ball more as TSU just looks gassed already on D. Pound them into submission. It's hard on a back to just come in for a play or two. Let's get Jackson going and let the OL have some fun
Halftime thoughts:
The good:
GT has exceeded my expectations in this game. He’s made (mostly) good decisions, taken care of the ball, and been accurate on most of his throws. He’s been good on the run as well. Despite not having a ton of live reps under his belt he looks like a veteran Big Sky WB
O-line has looked solid.
Receivers - only a few dropped balls and lots of different players with watches.
Special teams looks much improved. Solid punting, kickoffs, and coverages for the most part. Yes we had the missed XP but frankly it looked like he just slipped on the wet turf.
+1 on TO margin.
The bad:
Way too many big plays surrendered by the D. The first quarter in particular was terrible with plays way out of position on several plays. They did seem to settle in some in the second quarter though.
At least one trip into the red zone with no points. I guess we missed a FG as well so maybe kicking is not as improved as I previously mentioned.
Tackling.
LB’s look slow to the point of attack. I figured that position would be a weakness this year. You can tell there are young players in there.
The good:
GT has exceeded my expectations in this game. He’s made (mostly) good decisions, taken care of the ball, and been accurate on most of his throws. He’s been good on the run as well. Despite not having a ton of live reps under his belt he looks like a veteran Big Sky WB
O-line has looked solid.
Receivers - only a few dropped balls and lots of different players with watches.
Special teams looks much improved. Solid punting, kickoffs, and coverages for the most part. Yes we had the missed XP but frankly it looked like he just slipped on the wet turf.
+1 on TO margin.
The bad:
Way too many big plays surrendered by the D. The first quarter in particular was terrible with plays way out of position on several plays. They did seem to settle in some in the second quarter though.
At least one trip into the red zone with no points. I guess we missed a FG as well so maybe kicking is not as improved as I previously mentioned.
Tackling.
LB’s look slow to the point of attack. I figured that position would be a weakness this year. You can tell there are young players in there.
luckyintheorder said:GT's been about 80% to the good despite occasional lack of accuracy on w i d e open receivers. OL is playing very well. Still would run the ball more as TSU just looks gassed already on D. Pound them into submission. It's hard on a back to just come in for a play or two. Let's get Jackson going and let the OL have some fun
I think if we’re able to open up a 2-3 TD lead we’ll see just that. I agree, their D line was looking really gassed in the 2nd quarter.
Atomic Eagle
Active member
EWURanger said:Halftime thoughts:
The good:
GT has exceeded my expectations in this game. He’s made (mostly) good decisions, taken care of the ball, and been accurate on most of his throws. He’s been good on the run as well. Despite not having a ton of live reps under his belt he looks like a veteran Big Sky WB
O-line has looked solid.
Receivers - only a few dropped balls and lots of different players with watches.
Special teams looks much improved. Solid punting, kickoffs, and coverages for the most part. Yes we had the missed XP but frankly it looked like he just slipped on the wet turf.
+1 on TO margin.
The bad:
Way too many big plays surrendered by the D. The first quarter in particular was terrible with plays way out of position on several plays. They did seem to settle in some in the second quarter though.
At least one trip into the red zone with no points. I guess we missed a FG as well so maybe kicking is not as improved as I previously mentioned.
Tackling.
LB’s look slow to the point of attack. I figured that position would be a weakness this year. You can tell there are young players in there.
I will add that the receivers are getting very good separation. Wide open a lot of the time.
Seattle Eagle
Active member
Roberson is clearly the big play receiver on this year's roster. I'm interested in seeing who else can put up some numbers to complement him. Chism is a reliable option in the slot position but not sure he has the breakaway speed to stretch the field. He's more of a shifty guy with good hands.
Seattle Eagle
Active member
Wow, penalties anyone?
luckyintheorder
Active member
OK the ref's are off the hook now... stop it.
eaglesfootball
Active member
Two penalties, couldn’t make them out.
luckyintheorder
Active member
luckyintheorder said:OK the ref's are off the hook now... stop it.
Welcome to BigSky officials Coach..
eaglesfootball
Active member
damn lightning.
luckyintheorder
Active member
EWURanger said:Halftime thoughts:
The good:
GT has exceeded my expectations in this game. He’s made (mostly) good decisions, taken care of the ball, and been accurate on most of his throws. He’s been good on the run as well. Despite not having a ton of live reps under his belt he looks like a veteran Big Sky WB
O-line has looked solid.
Receivers - only a few dropped balls and lots of different players with watches.
Special teams looks much improved. Solid punting, kickoffs, and coverages for the most part. Yes we had the missed XP but frankly it looked like he just slipped on the wet turf.
+1 on TO margin.
The bad:
Way too many big plays surrendered by the D. The first quarter in particular was terrible with plays way out of position on several plays. They did seem to settle in some in the second quarter though.
At least one trip into the red zone with no points. I guess we missed a FG as well so maybe kicking is not as improved as I previously mentioned.
Tackling.
LB’s look slow to the point of attack. I figured that position would be a weakness this year. You can tell there are young players in there.
before the delay not sure I was seeing any adjustments except for the cash someone gave the ref's.
eaglesfootball
Active member
This sucks.
luckyintheorder
Active member
[media]https://twitter.com/EWUFootball/status/1566148436814344192?s=20&t=etuPKeAowdJE2RWDU43-iA[/media]
