• Hi Guest,

    We've updated the site to combine all the forums that were part of the Big Sky Fans Network into one location. This will make it easier to navigate and participate in all the discussions for each school without having to have multiple accounts, etc. We are still working out some tweaks but please let us know if you notice anything.

    With the migration, in some circumstances, your username could have been merged with one of your other usernames from the other forums. If this is the case, you can request to change your username in your account details page of your profile.
  • Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!
  • Guest, do want an ad free experience on BigSkyFans.com among other benefits? Upgrade your account today!

    Simply click your profile name > account upgrades > BigSky Club > choose between the year long subscription (two free months) or month to month

    Thanks for the continued support. Cheers!

It's not the gym's fault

Green Cookie Monster

Moderator
Staff member
These guys play in the Matadump a gym even worse than the Hornets Nest. They are 12-3 and nationally ranked....

January 12th 2008
Matadors Battle Back From First Half Deficit To Defeat Pacific, 78-61
Box Score

Northridge, Calif. – It’s a team of heart, a team of character, perhaps a team of destiny.

Whatever the description, the nationally-ranked Cal State Northridge men’s basketball team is beginning to earn the accolades from fans and the community as a near capacity crowd at The Matadome watched CSUN battle back from a nine-point first half deficit to beat back a highly-determined effort from the Pacific Tigers on Saturday night in a Big West game. The final score … Cal State Northridge 78, Pacific 61.

The winning streak now stands at a season-best five games. The Matador’s overall record is an impressive 12-3, but more importantly, the Matadors sit alone atop the Big West standings with a 4-0 record. The conference start is the best since the school became an NCAA Division I member in 1990-91, and the best league start overall since the 1977-78 season when the Matadors started CCAA play at 5-0.

Pacific, which had beaten Cal State Northridge eleven of the last 12 times previous to Saturday night, was not intimidated by the Matador record or the hostile crowd. The Tigers jumped to a 5-0 lead and upped the margin to seven points, 9-2, with 14:18 in the first half. Cal State Northridge missed its first six shots, and did not score its first basket until 15:13 remaining.

Cal State Northridge mounted a rally to take a 12-11 with 10:54 on a jumper by Therin Taylor, but back came Pacific. A 6-0 Pacific run made it 17-12, and the Tiger lead expanded to as many as nine points, 30-21, with 1:03 left in the first half.

Despite the fact that CSUN shot only .357 (10-28), went 0-for-12 from three-point territory, and was out rebounded, 25-19, the first half ended with Pacific in front by only six points, 31-25. The Matadors were determined to take Pacific’s best shot and assume command of the game in the second half.

“We held our own defensively in the first half,” said senior all-conference candidate Jonathan Heard. “Our shots were not falling, but we have confidence that the shots will eventually fall … just keep shooting. That’s what happened in the second half, and our defense continued to be aggressive.”

Deon Tresvant, who ended the evening with 14 points, said the locker room talk at halftime was one of optimism. “We told ourselves at halftime that the game isn’t over, it’s just beginning,” said Tresvant, who hit four of four 3-point attempts in the second half. “We have been a second half team the whole season, and our defense helped us to victory.”

The second half was a much different story. The Matadors shot an amazing 70 percent (21-for-30), a remarkable .750 from three-point territory (9-for-12) and outscored the Tigers, 53-30. The 53 points was the most scored by the Matadors in the second half this year. At one point, Pacific upped its lead to nine points, 34-25 (19:03 remaining), but a 19-9 run in the next six minutes gave the Matadors its first lead (44-43) since early in the game. From there, the Matadors never allowed the Tigers jump in front. A 32-14 run gave the Matadors their biggest lead of the game, 76-57, with 2:03 remaining.

The Matadors, picked to finish sixth in the Big West, have now earned the moniker as “the team to beat” in the league. Head coach Bobby Braswell admits the target is directly on the back of the Northridge jersey.

“Pacific came out aggressively to start the game, and that caught us a bit off-guard,” said Braswell. “I told the guys we were not shooting the ball, we were not playing well and Pacific had a lot to do with that. We were a bit impatient offensively in the first half. But I told the guys that we could stay in the game with our defense.”

The team listened to the words of the head coach and the results have translated into a special team with big goals.

“It’s an absolute blessing to have a group of guys who listen,” said Braswell. “They pay attention to details. I told them that the shots we missed in the first half, we would get to fall in the second half if we continued to work hard.”

In the end, the Matadors shot .534 (31-for-58) from the floor compared to .407 (22-for-54) for Pacific.

In chalking up a 4-0 league record, three of those wins have been against teams that picked in the pre-season poll to finish 1-2-3, UC Santa Barbara, Cal Poly and Pacific.

“We are fighters, not quitters,” said Heard, who tallied a team-high 16 points (8-for-11 from the floor). “We said that the first day of practice. We are a dedicated, hard-working team.”

Braswell also echoed remarks by Heard.

“I told the team they are writing their own history,” said Braswell. “I told them this is the best (conference) start of any team since the school went Division I. I think they are buying into that. I think this team has talked about their goals. There were a couple timeouts during the game where they got together to remind themselves what they needed to do (to win). That’s what you like to see as a coach.”

The victory was not without a price. With just less than seven minutes remaining in the game, senior all-conference candidate Calvin Chitwood suffered what has been initially described as a high ankle sprain. Further evaluation will be done on Monday. Chitwood scored ten points (5-for-7 from the floor) and added a team-high seven rebounds along with three steals.

Cal State Northridge continues league action on Wednesday (Jan. 16) at UC Riverside. Game time is 7:00 p.m.
 
its only part the gym's fault.

1. it will help recruiting, one of the reasons wsu is always good is becuase of the dee events center (12,000), recruits come see it and are impressed especially when we are recruiting against other big sky & big west schools which happens all the time.

2. northridge is rarely good in basketball. the last good season they had was 2001 when the hosted the big sky tournament and they didn't even make it to the Big Dance.

3. in the big west the better schools have the bigger stadiums, most of the schools with the sac size gyms aren't good very often. you can see all the arena sizes on Wikipedia compared to each others for each conference.

4. a new arena is a fresh start, would be nice to go with a new coach, i realize this can't happen though by next october.

5. sac needs a new place and the players deserve to play in something else for div I basketball.
 
Hey, Wildcat:

There are only three decent arenae in the Big West: the Spanos Center at UOP, the Pyramid at LBSU, and the Bren Events Center at either Ir-Whine or Foolerton (I forget which). The rest are varying levels of cr@p, with Riverside and the Matadump at the bottom of the list.

Your point about Northridge is very good. There's debate right now about a perhaps mythical second-half-of-the-season collapse that most BW fans think Northridge is famous for. Naturally, Northridge fans dispute this. We'll see.

About Sac needing a new arena: that would be VERY nice, and not just for hoops. The volleyball and gymnastics teams could continue their meteoric rises given the recruiting that comes with a new home. However, it can't be just any place. I remember as a Sac wannabe football player ushering hoops games at the Memorial Auditorium downtown to generate funds for the football team. If anything, the Nest is better than that. The Auditorium was generally opera seating in the round with freaking chandeliers overhead. The lighting and acoustics were so bad for basketball that one could say we had a home court DISadvantage. And how do you get dorm folk out to a game off campus? We'd be better off erecting an outdoor court on the football field, if you ask me.

We can have a new COACH by next Oct, but probably not a new arena. And it's got to be a new ARENA, not another gym. Gyms just don't cut it in the D-I world. But will the school fund it? Will they allow it to be funded outside? I know things have changed since the Fat Man Era, but they haven't changed THAT much. I still remember the baseball/softball complex an outside investor wanted to build and deed to the school over time, until the administration got cold feet and put a stop to the whole thing. Not to mention the Big Sky state-of-the-art (at the time) weight room that Bob Visger almost singlehandedly funded AND built (with help from players and player parents) that now supports the football and track teams; the school put up so many roadblocks on that, it wasn't even funny.

We have GOT to get some new athletics-friendly people in the administration, or this school will never be what it can be athletically.
 
The criminal part is that the students did vote and approve a new 8,000 seat arena to be built. Trouble is, Gonzo, said the vote did not include funding for an arena, just a REC center. Which is bogus and a downright lie. The arena was plastered over everything before the vote was held and then quietly removed after the vote passed.
The problem is the failure of the school fund raising people of which Gonzo Jr. is a participant.

SH, which fat man are you referring too? Gonzo has put on a few lbs.
 
GCM, when that vote came around, all anyone was talking about what the Arena/Events center. It was plastered on all the fliers and in every Gonzo/Wanless speech.

It was a complete and utter bait and switch. With the budget difficulties outlined by the governator, I don't see this thing getting done in the next 10 years. I just wish Intel or Raley's or SOMEONE would step forward and that the state would LET them help with the funding.
 
Green Cookie Monster said:
The criminal part is that the students did vote and approve a new 8,000 seat arena to be built. Trouble is, Gonzo, said the vote did not include funding for an arena, just a REC center. Which is bogus and a downright lie. The arena was plastered over everything before the vote was held and then quietly removed after the vote passed.
The problem is the failure of the school fund raising people of which Gonzo Jr. is a participant.

SH, which fat man are you referring too? Gonzo has put on a few lbs.

I never saw Gonzo until last month at my sister's graduation. Of course I was referring to Gerth.
 
Kadeezy said:
GCM, when that vote came around, all anyone was talking about what the Arena/Events center. It was plastered on all the fliers and in every Gonzo/Wanless speech.

It was a complete and utter bait and switch. With the budget difficulties outlined by the governator, I don't see this thing getting done in the next 10 years. I just wish Intel or Raley's or SOMEONE would step forward and that the state would LET them help with the funding.

Somebody did step up, the students of Sac St., some of who are now alumni. But Gonzo cheated them and now we aren't going to get an arena anytime soon.

I like football and I hope our team does well but damn why put all that money into a fieldhouse??
 
FireGonzo said:
Kadeezy said:
GCM, when that vote came around, all anyone was talking about what the Arena/Events center. It was plastered on all the fliers and in every Gonzo/Wanless speech.

It was a complete and utter bait and switch. With the budget difficulties outlined by the governator, I don't see this thing getting done in the next 10 years. I just wish Intel or Raley's or SOMEONE would step forward and that the state would LET them help with the funding.

Somebody did step up, the students of Sac St., some of who are now alumni. But Gonzo cheated them and now we aren't going to get an arena anytime soon.

I like football and I hope our team does well but d@mn why put all that money into a fieldhouse??

Well if you are going to build the new Rec Center where the fieldhouse is, you are going to have to replace it...something that was not taken into consideration even at the time of the student vote. Yes it was sold as an arena/rec center, but the school quickly found out that to have the arena part would have taken up way too much sq. footage to where that building is going to be. I agree with separating out the arena from the rec center, however, there needs to be a timetable for its completion.

Still, more has been accomplished for all the sports facilities under Dr. Gonzalez than Dr. Gerth, which I had the pleasure of seeing as student all of my years in school.
 
That's true GCM, Gonzo has been a major improvement over Gerth. We've got some really nice new structures on campus (AIRC, Parking Garage, Bookstore, Fieldhouse -in progress), but I just feel lied to. As a student when the vote went through, we were told COMPLETETION by 2007-2008.

It's just really disappointing to have to watch some of our programs flounder when we were told we'd have this wonderful new facility.

:cry:
 
Sure, the Rec Center should be separate from the Arena. The question is where to put them. Since the Rec Center is supposed to benefit the student body, it should be somewhat close to where the student body is: as close as possible to the dorms. There's not much room in the dorm complex proper right now unless one looks at replacing that dilapidated chow hall; the catch is that the nice lawn area would go away as well. I'd say that the best place would be to demolish the old bookstore/food court area and build it there.

As for the arena, well, the best thing I can think of is to replace that Alumni Center taking up space in what used to be part of the parking lot near the stadium. Co-located athletics areas make for a convenient one-stop shopping for people going to games and for student-athletes working out. Of course, there would have to be a NEW weight facility installed somewhere so the gymnasts, volleyballers, and hoopsters don't have to go clear from practice in the arena to the old area just to lift.

I can't believe we have someone panning a fieldhouse. A proper fieldhouse is what houses at least a football team's offices, if not those of the other athletic teams. Does this guy want our team to be in portables for all of recorded history? Even South Florida, which started in trailers, now has their own nice office facility. They're barely ten years old. We've been in trailers for longer than that. It's just not right, and it costs us in recruiting. What a troll....
 
Kadeezy said:
That's true GCM, Gonzo has been a major improvement over Gerth. We've got some really nice new structures on campus (AIRC, Parking Garage, Bookstore, Fieldhouse -in progress), but I just feel lied to. As a student when the vote went through, we were told COMPLETETION by 2007-2008.

It's just really disappointing to have to watch some of our programs flounder when we were told we'd have this wonderful new facility.

:cry:

Try having this feeling for twenty years!
 
The Arena will be located in between the Alumni Center and Parking Garage III right behind the east grandstands to Hornet Stadium. Its on the webpage for the Spanos Sports Complex off the university's page.
 
Oh. I get it. Eliminate even MORE parking. Cause more stress during the school day and lose game attendance due to lack of parking.

Real smart, Gonzo. Real smart.

Dumb@$$.
 
Actually, with the third parking garage, its ok to eliminate that parking lot. We will not lose game attendance when we put the arena in. Its actually good planning having that third garage where it is: it services both the stadium and eventually the arena. It is a 3,200 space garage.
 
Super Hornet said:
I can't believe we have someone panning a fieldhouse. A proper fieldhouse is what houses at least a football team's offices, if not those of the other athletic teams. Does this guy want our team to be in portables for all of recorded history? Even South Florida, which started in trailers, now has their own nice office facility. They're barely ten years old. We've been in trailers for longer than that. It's just not right, and it costs us in recruiting. What a troll....

What a jerk you are. The students voted for their rec center and an arena. There was no mention of a fieldhouse and all this other crap. The money the students voted for, was to help basketball with a new arena.

But what they got was a rec center and a fieldhouse for football.

This is what's mentioned on the website.

"The Arena will be to the east of the stadium and is envisioned as seating 6,000 to 8,000 for events such as intercollegiate basketball, commencement and concerts. It is currently expected to be at least 160,000 square feet. A project timeline is being developed."

I don't care how they spin this. They lied to the students.

Hopefully this isn't a lie.

"The Recreation and Wellness Center will be approximately 150,000 square feet and locates to the north of Hornet Stadium. The facility will have a fitness center, indoor track, recreational courts, rock-climbing walls and a student health center. Final programming is complete and architectural drawings are underway. Construction is scheduled to begin in spring 2008 with completion expected in 2010."
 
Nobody's saying the administration didn't lie, FG. We ALL are pi$$ed with the bait and switch. However, a fieldhouse is freaking REQUIRED to get quality football recruits. Football is THE $$ sport at Sac and should be supported in much better fashion than it currently is. We need a fieldhouse and replacement of our bogus stands where we came VERY close to losing millions in a liability case when a Davis attorney fell through rotten boards on the visitors side not too long ago. Of course we want an arena. Of course it was promised. Of course Gonzo pulled a bait and switch. Nobody's denying that. But to claim that we don't need a fieldhouse that will support AT THE VERY LEAST five sports programs is shortsighted to say the very least.
 
No, the fieldhouse is required because the current one is going to be demolished to make room for the Rec Center. Unfortunately, that part of the planning process was forgotten. The school realized that after the vote went through. If you are going to put the Rec Center to the north of the stadium (and even back then during the vote, it was stated then that's where it was going to go), you were going to have to build football and track and field a fieldhouse for their locker rooms. It has nothing to do about required to get quality athletes. Those quality athletes will come as a result of having a brand new fieldhouse, but the reason why a new place is needed is because the current one is going bye-bye.
 
I'll stand by my point that the fieldhouse is required to get the recruits. However, SHA, your reason is better because it forces the school to recognize my point. If it weren't for that demolition, the admin could just turn a blind eye to recruiting as they've done for goodness knows how long.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top