SWeberCat02
Active member
The committee will look at more than wins and losses, and Eastern is ranked higher than Weber in both polls and in the GPI. And if Eastern and Weber both win Saturday, that isn't going to change, as a win in Flagstaff is going to look much better than a win at home vs a 4-6 Cal Poly team. You can argue that Eastern's lower division win shouldn't mean much, but in reality it means much more than Weber's close FBS losses. Weber's schedule put them in a hole before the season ever started. And apparently the athletic department hasn't learned anything from it, or just plain don't care. After all, its really just about money. And due to Weber's home attendance, in makes much more financial sense to play two FBS money games a year than to schedule two nonconference home games.talhadfoursteals said:Who cares if Eastern looked better in Missoula...I'm not trying to argue Native, it just pisses me off that Eastern, a team we handily defeated is going to be in the playoffs. They also have two Big Sky loses, if Weber wins and MSU loses they can't finish above us in the conference standings and they got killed in their FBS game, while Weber was in both of theirs and should have won one. Just because they have a DII win over lowly whatever Oregon doesn't mean they should get in. In my eyes they are 6-3 while Weber is 6-4. Thats how the NCAA should look at them too.