• Hi Guest,

    We've updated the site to combine all the forums that were part of the Big Sky Fans Network into one location. This will make it easier to navigate and participate in all the discussions for each school without having to have multiple accounts, etc. We are still working out some tweaks but please let us know if you notice anything.

    With the migration, in some circumstances, your username could have been merged with one of your other usernames from the other forums. If this is the case, you can request to change your username in your account details page of your profile.
  • Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!
  • Guest, do want an ad free experience on BigSkyFans.com among other benefits? Upgrade your account today!

    Simply click your profile name > account upgrades > BigSky Club > choose between the year long subscription (two free months) or month to month

    Thanks for the continued support. Cheers!

Roos Field Renovation

OCTOBER?????
tenor.gif
 
Please no one try and explain this away with a logical explanation. I will accept unrealistic photo's of something we won't see though.

tenor.gif
 
HeavyIsTheCrown said:
It can’t be this damn difficult to add a 5k grandstand & basic facilities. Lynn’s word is worth absolutely nothing!

I'll bet she is doing this strickly to piss you off... and it is working :rofl:
 
https://goeags.com/news/2019/5/10/general-news-releases-easterns-board-of-trustees-creates-stadium-task-force.aspx?path=genrel
According to this article the task force will consider;
"Specifically, the task force will study the fundraising history of Athletics, determine fundraising potential and a timeline for enhancement of athletic facilities, and identify potential donors."
If that is the criteria, we will be lucky to get more temporary aluminum bleachers!
 
:notworthy:
clawman said:
https://goeags.com/news/2019/5/10/general-news-releases-easterns-board-of-trustees-creates-stadium-task-force.aspx?path=genrel
According to this article the task force will consider;
"Specifically, the task force will study the fundraising history of Athletics, determine fundraising potential and a timeline for enhancement of athletic facilities, and identify potential donors."
If that is the criteria, we will be lucky to get more temporary aluminum bleachers!

What it sounds like to me is the BOT pushed this back again and I think it might have to do with overall Eastern budget issues. My guess is there are voices complaining about raising money for athletics while cutting 3 mil from the Ed budget. Unfortunately, we are going to lose all momentum again:(.
 
What baffles and frustrates me about this development is why now? What might be the questions at this point? It is well over a decade since the Gateway was envisioned and now someone thinks it is time for feasibility task force. :ohno:
 
FormerEag said:
And now per the Easterner, Lynn has pushed back the Roos Field proposal to October ):

According to the article in the Spokesman Lynn Hickey DID NOT push the proposal back to October, The postponement was ordered by The EWU Board and is understandable considering the current red ink in the Athletic Department and the school wide budget cuts. IMHO The Board will probably view Lynn's presentation and then table it. The needed facility expansion and "maintenance" is rightfully a low priority in the short term, thus making a construction/sale/rentback option the most viable plan available.
 
60s Savage said:
FormerEag said:
And now per the Easterner, Lynn has pushed back the Roos Field proposal to October ):

According to the article in the Spokesman Lynn Hickey DID NOT push the proposal back to October, The postponement was ordered by The EWU Board and is understandable considering the current red ink in the Athletic Department and the school wide budget cuts. IMHO The Board will probably view Lynn's presentation and then table it. The needed facility expansion and "maintenance" is rightfully a low priority in the short term, thus making a construction/sale/rentback option the most viable plan available.
How does a stadium remodel or expansion cost the University any money?
 
clawman said:
60s Savage said:
FormerEag said:
And now per the Easterner, Lynn has pushed back the Roos Field proposal to October ):

According to the article in the Spokesman Lynn Hickey DID NOT push the proposal back to October, The postponement was ordered by The EWU Board and is understandable considering the current red ink in the Athletic Department and the school wide budget cuts. IMHO The Board will probably view Lynn's presentation and then table it. The needed facility expansion and "maintenance" is rightfully a low priority in the short term, thus making a construction/sale/rentback option the most viable plan available.
How does a stadium remodel or expansion cost the University any money?

I don’t think it is about costing the university money, I think it is about PR. Could loss needed EWU staff support when “they are getting cut” while the “football team gets new projects.” Hopefully they can get through these cuts and move forward with fundraising.
 
clawman said:
60s Savage said:
FormerEag said:
And now per the Easterner, Lynn has pushed back the Roos Field proposal to October ):

According to the article in the Spokesman Lynn Hickey DID NOT push the proposal back to October, The postponement was ordered by The EWU Board and is understandable considering the current red ink in the Athletic Department and the school wide budget cuts. IMHO The Board will probably view Lynn's presentation and then table it. The needed facility expansion and "maintenance" is rightfully a low priority in the short term, thus making a construction/sale/rentback option the most viable plan available.
How does a stadium remodel or expansion cost the University any money?

I don’t think it is about costing the university money, I think it is about PR. Could loss needed EWU staff support when “they are getting cut” while the “football team gets new projects.” Hopefully they can get through these cuts and move forward with fundraising.
 
MLEagle said:
clawman said:
60s Savage said:
FormerEag said:
And now per the Easterner, Lynn has pushed back the Roos Field proposal to October ):

According to the article in the Spokesman Lynn Hickey DID NOT push the proposal back to October, The postponement was ordered by The EWU Board and is understandable considering the current red ink in the Athletic Department and the school wide budget cuts. IMHO The Board will probably view Lynn's presentation and then table it. The needed facility expansion and "maintenance" is rightfully a low priority in the short term, thus making a construction/sale/rentback option the most viable plan available.
How does a stadium remodel or expansion cost the University any money?

I don’t think it is about costing the university money, I think it is about PR. Could loss needed EWU staff support when “they are getting cut” while the “football team gets new projects.” Hopefully they can get through these cuts and move forward with fundraising.

I don’t know if I can still buy that. It’s always something that ends up taking priority over the football stadium. The hockey rink, the new PUB, university needs, etc.. Every other sport has satisfactory D1 facilities except for Eagle Football. Don’t get me started on the locker room, which looks great but it’s nowhere near the stadium. Both home & visiting teams have to dress a half-mile away from the facility.

This EWU Football team just got back from Frisco! What does the team have to do to earn an upgrade in the eyes of the university? :twocents:
 
MLEagle said:
clawman said:
60s Savage said:
FormerEag said:
And now per the Easterner, Lynn has pushed back the Roos Field proposal to October ):

According to the article in the Spokesman Lynn Hickey DID NOT push the proposal back to October, The postponement was ordered by The EWU Board and is understandable considering the current red ink in the Athletic Department and the school wide budget cuts. IMHO The Board will probably view Lynn's presentation and then table it. The needed facility expansion and "maintenance" is rightfully a low priority in the short term, thus making a construction/sale/rentback option the most viable plan available.
How does a stadium remodel or expansion cost the University any money?

I don’t think it is about costing the university money, I think it is about PR. Could loss needed EWU staff support when “they are getting cut” while the “football team gets new projects.” Hopefully they can get through these cuts and move forward with fundraising.
Not ALL staff members are opposed to athletics. Pride in your workplace matters to many and athletics is part of the puzzle at any institution.
 
HeavyIsTheCrown said:
MLEagle said:
clawman said:
60s Savage said:
FormerEag said:
And now per the Easterner, Lynn has pushed back the Roos Field proposal to October ):



I don’t know if I can still buy that. It’s always something that ends up taking priority over the football stadium. The hockey rink, the new PUB, university needs, etc.. Every other sport has satisfactory D1 facilities except for Eagle Football. Don’t get me started on the locker room, which looks great but it’s nowhere near the stadium. Both home & visiting teams have to dress a half-mile away from the facility.

This EWU Football team just got back from Frisco! What does the team have to do to earn an upgrade in the eyes of the university? :twocents:

You are comparing apples to oranges. The PUB, URC/Hockey Rink were funded by the students who chose to tax themselves for the construction. You cannot use state tax dollars for non-academic facilities anymore so no university money was used on those projects. Same thing with the football stadium renovation. There is simply no money to use for the project unless it is raised by donors. It sounds like the BOT is either not satisfied with the work done to this point on the presentation, or they are sensitive to how it looks to build onto the stadium while services, staff and programs are being reduced or cut. Like it or not, we are headed into another season status quo.
 
60s Savage said:
FormerEag said:
And now per the Easterner, Lynn has pushed back the Roos Field proposal to October ):

According to the article in the Spokesman Lynn Hickey DID NOT push the proposal back to October, The postponement was ordered by The EWU Board and is understandable considering the current red ink in the Athletic Department and the school wide budget cuts. IMHO The Board will probably view Lynn's presentation and then table it. The needed facility expansion and "maintenance" is rightfully a low priority in the short term, thus making a construction/sale/rentback option the most viable plan available.

It isn’t understandable. The stadium overhaul will never be completed with state funds. Most folks with even the slightest understanding of intercollegiate athletics understands this.

This is like planning for kids. If you’re waiting around for the “perfect” time it’s never going to happen.
 
Seattle Eagle said:
60s Savage said:
FormerEag said:
And now per the Easterner, Lynn has pushed back the Roos Field proposal to October ):

According to the article in the Spokesman Lynn Hickey DID NOT push the proposal back to October, The postponement was ordered by The EWU Board and is understandable considering the current red ink in the Athletic Department and the school wide budget cuts. IMHO The Board will probably view Lynn's presentation and then table it. The needed facility expansion and "maintenance" is rightfully a low priority in the short term, thus making a construction/sale/rentback option the most viable plan available.

It isn’t understandable. The stadium overhaul will never be completed with state funds. Most folks with even the slightest understanding of intercollegiate athletics understands this.

This is like planning for kids. If you’re waiting around for the “perfect” time it’s never going to happen.

:coffee:
 
clawman said:
MLEagle said:
clawman said:
60s Savage said:
FormerEag said:
And now per the Easterner, Lynn has pushed back the Roos Field proposal to October ):

According to the article in the Spokesman Lynn Hickey DID NOT push the proposal back to October, The postponement was ordered by The EWU Board and is understandable considering the current red ink in the Athletic Department and the school wide budget cuts. IMHO The Board will probably view Lynn's presentation and then table it. The needed facility expansion and "maintenance" is rightfully a low priority in the short term, thus making a construction/sale/rentback option the most viable plan available.
How does a stadium remodel or expansion cost the University any money?

I don’t think it is about costing the university money, I think it is about PR. Could loss needed EWU staff support when “they are getting cut” while the “football team gets new projects.” Hopefully they can get through these cuts and move forward with fundraising.
Not ALL staff members are opposed to athletics. Pride in your workplace matters to many and athletics is part of the puzzle at any institution.

I completely agree and realize that some of the biggest Eagle athletic supporters are current and former university staff (e.g Vic Wallace). However, if the university wants to maintain that mutual respect and support between athletics and the university staff in general, there can’t be perceived favoritism. If you are being cut and feeling the pain of budget cuts while the other guy is getting enhancements and a fundraising drive for new stuff, there is bound to be jealousy. I believe the BOT is acting with great awareness toward the budget situation. PR matters, and if waiting another few months is the difference between success and failure I can wait. But, don’t get me wrong, I also feel like we have waited too long already too but that is not Lynn’s fault either.
 
HeavyIsTheCrown said:
Seattle Eagle said:
60s Savage said:
FormerEag said:
And now per the Easterner, Lynn has pushed back the Roos Field proposal to October ):

According to the article in the Spokesman Lynn Hickey DID NOT push the proposal back to October, The postponement was ordered by The EWU Board and is understandable considering the current red ink in the Athletic Department and the school wide budget cuts. IMHO The Board will probably view Lynn's presentation and then table it. The needed facility expansion and "maintenance" is rightfully a low priority in the short term, thus making a construction/sale/rentback option the most viable plan available.

It isn’t understandable. The stadium overhaul will never be completed with state funds. Most folks with even the slightest understanding of intercollegiate athletics understands this.

This is like planning for kids. If you’re waiting around for the “perfect” time it’s never going to happen.

:coffee:
AH, :facepalm: After all these years, and 5 kids, if I had only known to wait for the perfect time.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top