http://www.deseretnews.com/article/...-of-experience-and-new-faces-next-season.htmlChapman was granted a release from his scholarship after expressing a desire to be closer to home in Roy.
Krystkowiak accommodated the request and even made an exception to the usual parameters of not allowing transfers permission to play at other Pac-12 schools or instate programs. Chapman was given permission to play for Weber State in Ogden.
“He stated to me that his baby was top priority — that they had this year — and that his mom and his high school friends were all really important to him and he wasn’t having much fun playing basketball anymore,” Krystkowiak said. “So he wanted to go back and be a part of that and so that made perfectly good sense to release him to Weber State. I wasn’t going to fight that based on the circumstances.”
WILDCAT said:I can see blocking him from transferring to another Pac 12 school, but why block him from the other Instate schools? It's not like Utah will be playing any of them.
talhadfoursteals said:Doesn't make a lot of sense for a kid from Roy to leave Salt Lake, with the excuse "I want to be closer to friends and family." Then to transfer to a school in Logan, which is farther away from his original school. To be honest, I think LK, who is a vengeful turd, is calling Chapman's excuse. He is only willing to release him to the school closest to his home. The place he claims he wants to be.
To me, so what...it means that Weber ends up with a guy who has two years of experience playing in the PAC-12 and has a lot of potential and ability. A guy who was a 4 Star recruit, an ESPN Top 50, who had offers from a handful of P6 teams.
talhadfoursteals said:Doesn't make a lot of sense for a kid from Roy to leave Salt Lake, with the excuse "I want to be closer to friends and family." Then to transfer to a school in Logan, which is farther away from his original school. To be honest, I think LK, who is a vengeful turd, is calling Chapman's excuse. He is only willing to release him to the school closest to his home. The place he claims he wants to be."
UtahPirate said:talhadfoursteals said:Doesn't make a lot of sense for a kid from Roy to leave Salt Lake, with the excuse "I want to be closer to friends and family." Then to transfer to a school in Logan, which is farther away from his original school. To be honest, I think LK, who is a vengeful turd, is calling Chapman's excuse. He is only willing to release him to the school closest to his home. The place he claims he wants to be."
I have yet to read that quote attributed to Chapman himself, so I agree. I think it was a way for Coach Koward to save face -- to have an excuse that put the transfer on the player and not on the fact that this is the third player to leave and something is rotten at Utah (which is no surprise since it is a rotten institution in numerous ways) and its basketball program. I noticed an article in the Des a couple of days later (I didn't read it) on the U basketball program and it being a blend of "experience and young talent" or some such nonsense. It seemed to me the timing of the article was another PR grab by Koward to calm fan's nerves. Something is up.
I want Chapman and want him badly (he seems to fit so well), but Oldrunner's points seem consistent with how Coach Rahe runs his program. So it may be awhile.
talhadfoursteals said:Regardless, the ship is taking on water at the U and is starting to sink.
SWeberCat02 said:talhadfoursteals said:Regardless, the ship is taking on water at the U and is starting to sink.
Krisco reached his high water mark last season and it was only good enough to finish 2nd in an overrated conference and a second round beat down by the Zags.
A high school athlete would be wise to decline to sign an NLI with any school, and sign a scholarship agreement instead. NLIs give the schools leverage over an athlete whereas a scholarship agreement gives the athlete all the leverage. Under the agreement the school is bound to provide aid to the athlete, but the athlete can change his or her mind right up until the first day of classes.WSUProf said:A bit off topic, but can someone please explain to me why a coach is given the power by the NCAA to pretty much prevent a kid from transferring by blocking him from getting a scholarship at other schools? Just another way, I guess, of exploiting the student-athlete.
There is also no time limit on the financial aid agreement. I believe that the letter of intent spring period is over now. It does not stop a player from signing a financial aid agreement, or committing to a program, or enrolling at a school. However, once enrolled it is still one of the eligibility years, where they have 5 to complete 4. Once enrolled, all of the transfer rules kick in.Bengal visitor said:A high school athlete would be wise to decline to sign an NLI with any school, and sign a scholarship agreement instead. NLIs give the schools leverage over an athlete whereas a scholarship agreement gives the athlete all the leverage. Under the agreement the school is bound to provide aid to the athlete, but the athlete can change his or her mind right up until the first day of classes.WSUProf said:A bit off topic, but can someone please explain to me why a coach is given the power by the NCAA to pretty much prevent a kid from transferring by blocking him from getting a scholarship at other schools? Just another way, I guess, of exploiting the student-athlete.