OldSchoolHornet said:
I never suggested hiring anyone back...I questioned your "banning all ex-assistants for life" statement...WTF does that mean anyway?
You wouldn’t be so butthurt about it unless you actually think bringing those ex-assistants back is worthwhile. Only a delusional idiot would expect different results from rehiring the former assistants. As far as what I meant by “banning”, I was pretty clear about it above. Try and keep up.
Rebuilt a hapless program? When did he do that? Sperbeck never once won more than six games in a season and got his ass out-coached routinely by Davis.
The fact is Sperbeck has the best D1 accolades in Hornet history. Anyone not living in a cave for the last 7 years knows that. The Hornet football program is much better now than it was when he took over. Again, try and keep up. I would lay out some figures but I already know numbers are tough for you to comprehend.
Trivia question of the week: Only once has Hornet football exceeded 6 wins in the D1 era. What coach accomplished this?
Hint: This coach’s era concluded with a memorable cloud of aerosol cooking spray on the sidelines in Missoula. :dunce:
You want me to give him credit for being better than Mooshaigian? I'll do you one better...he was better than Mooshagian and Brady...but that's it. And neither one of those clowns got caught cheating.
Brady coached over 35 years ago so I guess that’s relevant. :roll: And there were a myriad of off the field issue with Moosh, but hey he wasn’t caught cheating!!! Yet another double standard by you. :lol:
He was the HC...he was absolutely at fault. He signed a contract allowing the university the ability to terminate him if he cheated and he went there anyway. If he would have been running a clean program there would have not been anything to report. If he wasn't guilty, why didn't he stay and fight?
If one of his players would have been caught cheating on a final they would have cut loose immediately and made an example of.
I never argued Sperbecks wasn’t at fault. All along I have been saying he is accountable for the program, both the good and the bad. Try and keep up.
What kind of example was that molder-of-young-men setting? How many mother's of recruits are disgusted they allowed their son to go to Sac State? Do you have any idea how much damage he has done for recruiting seasons to come. The program will not fully recover for years.
Unless more serious infractions come to light, I’m sure current and past players mom’s are horrified at the thought that their kids played for someone who was ousted for talking on the phone too long and dropping by to see a recruit during a “dead” period. Oh the horror!!!
Let’s lock Sperbeck in a cage and throw away the key. What an evil monster he is! And it is absolutely comical that you think this program is not resilient enough to overcome those low level of infractions. Your “logic” regarding this damage is comical. :lol:
BTW I find it hysterical that someone who admittedly came on this board looking to drum up support for an anti-Sperbeck crusade is suddenly worried about the harm done to the program. It doesn’t get better than this, I mean you can’t make this sh!t up. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Suggesting the letter may have been drafted by more than one entity doesn't mean I think I know who wrote the letter. I have no idea who wrote the letter. Someone else "floated the idea" that it might have come from someone currently on the staff. By your line of reasoning they should dump the current assistants too since at least some of them had to know about the infractions and might speak up later.
No, if current staff knew about the infractions and did nothing then they should be let go for that ethical lapse. This is only about the 3rd time in this thread that this point has been made. Again try and keep up.
At this point the only person who needs to banished is the guy who just let the entire Sac State football team down by exercising poor judgment that ultimately got sent packing as they were supposed to be preparing for a successful season.
Double standard my ass.
Your “logic” regarding anything Sperbeck related is riddled with double standards and unbridled bias. Where is your outrage towards Volek due to Pam-gate? Where are the over the top doomsday predictions about the damage caused by the rock throwing idiots under Moosh? Surely those incidents pale in comparison to extended phone calls and unapproved recruiting visits.
Yeah OSH, no double standards by you at all. Keep the hits coming my man, because obviously they are endless. :nod: :lol:
