Dawg Pound said:I made a thread right after the game congratulating you guys on the way your team played and the EWU talent as a whole. In my opinion, you deserved that game more than us, and certainly looked like you wanted it more.
That said, we absolutely did play a vanilla scheme. If you would have watched any of our games last year, the contrast should be glaring and obvious. On the defensive side of the ball, Nick Holt had me scratching my head the entire game. I was fuming at his decision not to change up coverages. When you have a QB destroying your zone with quick slants off a three step drop, you switch to press coverage. Inexplicably, Holt did nothing to change the schemes. Furthermore, on those third and long plays he dropped everyone back and rush only three. This had me literally yelling at my TV. I don't care if you're playing a high school team, you give a receiver enough time and he WILL get open. For whatever reason, UW did not play their usual style of ball. This is a fact and really not up for any legit debate. However, it's not an excuse. Eastern is that good, and UW should be ashamed for taking them lightly.
I think UW went in to this with a fairly vanilla game plan to try to keep things simple for Price's first start. And Price wasn't spectacular, but for his first start he did what he needed to do and didn't turn the ball over. We knew UW would try and lean on us and run the ball and that's exactly what happened. Although we were ok stopping Polk at times, he got enough productivity to keep UW on the field long enough to get all those FG's. All things considered, I think our defense did pretty well. I was actually a bit surprised that our young corners were not tested more than they were.
On defense, I can understand the effects of having a lot of new guys playing in their first game can do. So I can see where they might have wanted to keep things simple. That said, I don't think the UW coaches really had an appreciation for how talented EWU is offensively. There is that difference in talent and depth in general between FBS and FCS, but a good QB is a good QB. Tall receivers with speed will still hurt you. But I was really surprised that UW did not adjust coverages more. I can only deduce that the db's were playing so far off the line of scrimmage because they were concerned about giving up the big play over the top, which was a real possibility (it happened anyway). So vanilla plan or not, when you are giving up that many yards without making adjustments, that is a coaching deficiency IMO. You need to have the flexibility to change your game plan on the fly. I do think that UW needs to get their coverage situation worked out prior to this weekend though, because I imagine Hawaii will try to do the same thing we did on you.
I think the big take-away for this for UW should be that these games aren't played on paper. If you don't prepare 100% for every opponent, you can very well get beat. To an extent I think our team had to learn this the hard way last season, as we almost lost to Division II Central Washington. They were a very good football team that was undoubtedly in a similar mindset that EWU was going into the Washington game. Teams will generally play a little bit more inspired ball when they are playing up a Division, especially against an in-state school.