Cats meow! said:Rahe is part of the problem. I really think the players look lost and the story that they are too young just doesn't make sense. I agree with midmajor the issues are the same and the competition is well scouted on Weber's foibles!SWeberCat02 said:Note to Coach Rahe: Quit being so stubborn and change the lineup already! Try something different. Anything. What's it going to hurt at this point?
Hill needs help...... But who do you replace him with in the line up. Rahe just refuses to give a lot of playing time to James and Van Pelt is buried on the bench. I think the team really misses Beckner.
3Wildcats said:Aw ww I must have right about your wife as well because I know I was right about what you said about Coston. It's ok we are what we are and you are a fan with know clue and a dumpling at home so get out of your feelings.
What a moron! An AAU wannabe trying to live off athletes with skills he never had! Take the money and improve your education! Your post are pathetic! My guess is that you are too!3Wildcats said:Aw ww I must have right about your wife as well because I know I was right about what you said about Coston. It's ok we are what we are and you are a fan with know clue and a dumpling at home so get out of your feelings.
:lol: What's a panty weight? I think it's panty waist. This is as entertaining as the Super Bowl. opcorn:3Wildcats said:Aww look two more panty weights. Just remember this you are the idiots that screamed with the cheerleaders in your skirts for me and guys that I have prepared for college and the pros for years so I will keep laughing at you guys who think you know this game all day long. Remember to ask one of my guys for an autograph at your next pro game and I will laugh with them about you jock strap sniffer in the locker rooms, bars and arena suites the next time you are their. Learn the game before try to talk about it. You sniffer are in your feelings and I am loving it.
Sir Velo said:You guys look lame making fun of Grammer and spelling on a fan board.
Plus tal is a talentless wannabe that only attends and complains cuz Abbeglen cut him at student try outs. Now he is just a towny drop out.
3Wildcats said:Randy and those coaches know what they are talking about. Tal you were the idiot before the season started that just knew Coston was going come in and be the next Mook so we already know you couldn't play yourself out of a brown paper bag let alone beat Randy in a game of kickball. Fans are a means to and end and that's the only way we should ever look at you all. You ride our jocks when we are winning thinking we really care about you and then when we have a tough year you act like you can tell us how to play. You are a stepping stone to you are right about one thing an education and in some cases the next level. Guys like you go home and tell you dumpling of a wife I help our team to a win tonight or I wish they would listen to me know what I am talking about. Stick to what you know Tal and I guarantee you after your Coston prediction is not basketball.
talhadfoursteals said:So...the UNCO game didn't go so well. We lacked toughness and defensive intensity. One thing about the Sky, which is a bit unusual, is that there are a bunch of very mature and veteran teams. The cubbies are one of those teams. They have a handful of senior players, who are major contributors. Losing to Weber, on their court, against, what they deem as a rival wasn't going to happen. After halftime they took the floor determined. Weber didn't match the cubbies intensity. Heavens it seemed they didn't even want to play. That could be youth, lack of leadership, no team chemistry a number of things. Weber is talented enough to beat every team. They just don't seem very excited to rise to the challenge.
On a side note, I really like Hill. He is a good kid, who has a bright future. What frustrates me is that he has sooo much talent. He is smart and a good character kid. He just seems lost at times. There are moments he is sooo smooth and efficient, and then there are those times he disappears on the court. I want him to succeed. I want them all to succeed. Yet, being a scholarshipped player brings with it a level of necessary accomplishment and success. If you aren't meeting the committed expectation then you run the chance of losing your support. That how it is with every scholarship, that's how it is in life.
Beardown said:talhadfoursteals said:So...the UNCO game didn't go so well. We lacked toughness and defensive intensity. One thing about the Sky, which is a bit unusual, is that there are a bunch of very mature and veteran teams. The cubbies are one of those teams. They have a handful of senior players, who are major contributors. Losing to Weber, on their court, against, what they deem as a rival wasn't going to happen. After halftime they took the floor determined. Weber didn't match the cubbies intensity. Heavens it seemed they didn't even want to play. That could be youth, lack of leadership, no team chemistry a number of things. Weber is talented enough to beat every team. They just don't seem very excited to rise to the challenge.
On a side note, I really like Hill. He is a good kid, who has a bright future. What frustrates me is that he has sooo much talent. He is smart and a good character kid. He just seems lost at times. There are moments he is sooo smooth and efficient, and then there are those times he disappears on the court. I want him to succeed. I want them all to succeed. Yet, being a scholarshipped player brings with it a level of necessary accomplishment and success. If you aren't meeting the committed expectation then you run the chance of losing your support. That how it is with every scholarship, that's how it is in life.
Where did you get the idea that UNC believes Weber is a rival? I for one don't consider you guys a rival.
oldrunner said:I'll take responsibility for making those comparisons last summer. They were based on watching their performance at that time. The problem was not what they were doing offensively, because they looked really good. The aspect that I failed to see is what a poor defensive squad we had. I just assumed that we would be as good as always on D. If I would have known what a weak defensive team this was, it would have told me that these guys were not as good as they looked. Our own weak D was making them look good. It was a mistake that I plan to avoid, as much as I can, in the future. Playing a zone may be the only thing we can do with consistency. We are just too passive to play good man D. :twocents: