jars said:Really going to have to hit everything and keep up the pressure on D here. Can't let 'em run away with it now.
monty said:good game - you guys played us tough with some solid defense and forced us into a jump shooting team the first 30 minutes. best of luck in the future
From Mvemjsunpx
Your team did an OK job, particularly on defense, but no-one other than Beitzel could make a thing. SDSU didn't exactly put on a shooting clinic, either, but I get the impression they've been winning like that all year.
The next couple years will be a big test for BJ Hill, because all the impact players from the Boyle era are gone.
Brian said:I moved this from a different thread:
From Mvemjsunpx
Your team did an OK job, particularly on defense, but no-one other than Beitzel could make a thing. SDSU didn't exactly put on a shooting clinic, either, but I get the impression they've been winning like that all year.
The next couple years will be a big test for BJ Hill, because all the impact players from the Boyle era are gone.
jars said:Brian said:I moved this from a different thread:
From Mvemjsunpx
Your team did an OK job, particularly on defense, but no-one other than Beitzel could make a thing. SDSU didn't exactly put on a shooting clinic, either, but I get the impression they've been winning like that all year.
The next couple years will be a big test for BJ Hill, because all the impact players from the Boyle era are gone.
Guy is a good student of the game, and his not wrong.
Brian said:jars said:Brian said:I moved this from a different thread:
From Mvemjsunpx
Your team did an OK job, particularly on defense, but no-one other than Beitzel could make a thing. SDSU didn't exactly put on a shooting clinic, either, but I get the impression they've been winning like that all year.
The next couple years will be a big test for BJ Hill, because all the impact players from the Boyle era are gone.
Guy is a good student of the game, and his not wrong.
Yeah, I agree as well. We have some good exciting young players but it's always difficult to predict how they will develop.
Bearsfan24 said:Brian said:jars said:Brian said:I moved this from a different thread:
From Mvemjsunpx
Your team did an OK job, particularly on defense, but no-one other than Beitzel could make a thing. SDSU didn't exactly put on a shooting clinic, either, but I get the impression they've been winning like that all year.
The next couple years will be a big test for BJ Hill, because all the impact players from the Boyle era are gone.
Guy is a good student of the game, and his not wrong.
Yeah, I agree as well. We have some good exciting young players but it's always difficult to predict how they will develop.
I think next year will be interesting. Lloyd and Procter are going to be leaned on to lead the team. Addo, Tate, and Garnica are all going to be looked at to produce more. With the injured players coming back I think they'll help out as well. Plus the new recruits, I've found some video of them and they look very promising.
You never know though, after last season I didn't expect this team to do much, and thought that was going to be the case after the start of the season. But yet, looked what happen, big sky champs. I don't expect them to repeat, I think they'll be middle of the pack team.
aztecwin said:Good game by the Bears! When the Aztecs hold an opponet to under 50, we get curly fries from Jack in the Box but only at home. I am looking forward to following you guys in football over the next few years. One of our local kids is going there and will help you out.