clawman said:
WarZone said:
I wouldn't rush the selection, and wouldn't throw away the idea of trying a season under the co-interim HCs left in place. This time frame is a delicate issue in regards to on the fence recruits with a possible change in staff.
There is no such thing as leadership by committee. Every organization needs
a leader.
Agree with this. If "they" are in charge, no "one's" in charge. Someone one said in a different leadership context, "things with two heads are put in the county fair and laughed at." I've been in a management situation where there were "co-managers" and no GM, and it was a mess.
As Chaves said, this all came up so fast, I think it may have been the immediate gut reaction to maintain some level of solidarity in the ranks, but this is not a good long term solution, and I can't imagine how this coaching scenario plays out for a full season. I guess if Chaves throws out a clear breakdown of responsibilities in which each one was ultimate authority...