blackfootbengal
Active member
There are two types of walk-on, the recruited walk-on who walk-ons with the understanding they will receive money in the future, if they are good enough to be offered. The other is just a kid who walks on hoping for playing time. There is never a guarantee that a walk-on will receive money or playing time, most do not. In reality, most walk-ons who do receive money, only receive money if they are academically sound in their last year and are participating on one of the units, i.e., special teams, defense, or offense. At the FCS level, they divide two or three scholarships to give these players money. Another reality is that you may find one or two walk-ons who are good enough to receive a full scholarship every year or so, but not all walk-ons meet this criterion. In fact, most do not. Boise loves to tell everyone how many walk-ons get money to play football. They do not mention the thirty other kids who walked on and did not receive money. They do not mention that most walk-ons receiving money at Boise were the preferred walk-ons. It is the same at every school, with numbers being the difference. The problem at ISU is; to fix our APR problem we gave some high academic walk-ons scholarships, most of these players on defense. No team can lose six scholarships then give 10 walk-ons money and not have it affect the play on the field for the next couple of years. Of the former walk-ons who we have on scholarship now, only three of them are players I believe should be on full rides. Two or three should be splitting a scholarship with the others still paying their own way. You do not win football games with a team made up of former walk-ons. Yes, you can find a walk-on occasionally who is good enough to receive money. No, you are not going to find these players every year. If you have a bunch of former walk-ons playing as starters on your team, you are going to have issues, thus our defense that could not stop anyone from running the ball. One game our front seven was make up of former walk-ons, and we wondered why we had issues with stopping the run.