Eaglefanatical
Active member
LDopaPDX said:
I have heard something similar although unsure of the details.
-
Hi Guest,
We've updated the site to combine all the forums that were part of the Big Sky Fans Network into one location. This will make it easier to navigate and participate in all the discussions for each school without having to have multiple accounts, etc. We are still working out some tweaks but please let us know if you notice anything.
With the migration, in some circumstances, your username could have been merged with one of your other usernames from the other forums. If this is the case, you can request to change your username in your account details page of your profile. -
Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!
-
Guest, do want an ad free experience on BigSkyFans.com among other benefits? Upgrade your account today!
Simply click your profile name > account upgrades > BigSky Club > choose between the year long subscription (two free months) or month to month
Thanks for the continued support. Cheers!
Roos Field Renovation
- Thread starter NickEag
- Start date
I have heard something similar although unsure of the details.
Eaglefanatical said:
Then you and I are in the same place. I don't have any details either, and there might not be any details at this point. What I've heard is that she basically walked in and said "where are you at on this on project?" and no one could give a clear answer. No one on the planet believes the stadium is sufficient as-is, but no one in leadership seems to be taking corrective action. Hopefully, she can provide the kick to the butt that gets this thing moving.
EWURanger said:
I'm so relived to hear this! At least she is on board with the project. I was worried the the new President might not have any interest or worse be anti athletics.
Every time I see a new post on this thread I click on it hoping it will be some good or at least some updated news but only to find a post on a unrelated subject. While not ground breaking new it is good news.
Most likely the GWP will be done in stages with the first being to relocate the track and move the field closer to the West stands, I'm just waiting for that!
EdubU10
Active member
Eagledawg said:
Removing the track, moving the field closer to the west stands and building better stands on the east is all we need at this point. That would improve the stadium ten fold. There is no excuse for the football facilities as they stand right now. High school stadiums are much nicer. We are the best program in the state and need a stadium to reflect that. I am optimistic the new president will make this happen but something needs to be done sooner rather than later.
If the Gateway project was designed to be multi use facility the area could attract big time entertainment all season long.The Isleta amphitheater is in Albuquerque.
http://www.isletaamphitheater.net/events/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Huge tourism generator for the area and exposure for the University.
To be clear I am not suggesting the facilities be the same as Isleta but be capable of having concerts, tractor pulls, super motor cross etc... and 5 football games per year
http://www.isletaamphitheater.net/events/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Huge tourism generator for the area and exposure for the University.
To be clear I am not suggesting the facilities be the same as Isleta but be capable of having concerts, tractor pulls, super motor cross etc... and 5 football games per year
BLACKFALKIN1
Active member
EdubU10 said:
I love EWU,I really do! However,I know stalling when I see it. The football team doesn't bring enough money annually to justify a 60 million dollar stadium renovation in CHENEY! Not only that, the current stadium costs about 5 mil~ ..... A RENOVATION/expansion would typically cost about 25-35% of the current stadiums's worth. Removing the track is a pipe dream baby! We would all LOVE for that to happen but it's last on THEIR lists. Expanding the east side is 1st on a VERY short list. Expanding the east side to the height of the north end one and the length of the west side is THE BEST we're gonna get for the next 50 years. BANK IT.
allweatherfan2
Active member
That is the realistic picture, Black Falkin
I agree with Blackfalkin. I don't think the original design was pragmatic in the slightest. My understanding is that it required $20mm just to get it off the ground, and that obviously didn't include financing of the remainder. Barring a corporate sponsor with huge pockets stepping up, that wasn't going to happen. It would be hard for any corporation to justify $20mm on a project that would generate a very nominal amount of press for their company.
If nothing has materialized yet, I'd agree to keep the track and move forward putting larger, taller grandstands onto the Eastside (maybe 5,000 seats) that resemble a much larger version of what we have in the North endzone. It wouldn't be a long-term solution, but it would at least get our capacity up to par and improve seating for those poor souls relegated to that side of the field. It would actually resemble one half of Sac State's stadium; it's not an ideal solution, but at least it would offer temporary relief.
If nothing has materialized yet, I'd agree to keep the track and move forward putting larger, taller grandstands onto the Eastside (maybe 5,000 seats) that resemble a much larger version of what we have in the North endzone. It wouldn't be a long-term solution, but it would at least get our capacity up to par and improve seating for those poor souls relegated to that side of the field. It would actually resemble one half of Sac State's stadium; it's not an ideal solution, but at least it would offer temporary relief.
Sac State's stadium, for those that haven't seen it:
http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=sacramento+state+football+stadium&view=detailv2&&id=118AC0456F6DA628FF7AB7FB69FAEF96390B7690&selectedIndex=8&ccid=woRQ1RAK&simid=608001957711644820&thid=JN.8OgU3HONGNAayh358tFLQg&ajaxhist=0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=sacramento+state+football+stadium&view=detailv2&&id=118AC0456F6DA628FF7AB7FB69FAEF96390B7690&selectedIndex=8&ccid=woRQ1RAK&simid=608001957711644820&thid=JN.8OgU3HONGNAayh358tFLQg&ajaxhist=0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I'm fine with matching the visiting side to the home side, but it needs to be a steel and concrete structure with concessions, restrooms and locker rooms. At a later date box seat structure could be added like the home side, but please no cheap looking aluminium bleachers.
EWUSigep447
Active member
What would be the point in making the gateway project such a big deal for a solid two years or so if it was never feasible to begin with? Do people believe that this was just a marketing scheme or something by Chavez to get people to take the program more seriously while simultaneously designing the project to fail/never happen? I don't understand why they would even make schematics and whatnot if it were never pragmatic.
Did our AD & Dept of University Advancement just miss this bus after we won the natty? Are the chances of a corporate sponsorship quickly dwindling as we distance ourselves from 2010?
Did our AD & Dept of University Advancement just miss this bus after we won the natty? Are the chances of a corporate sponsorship quickly dwindling as we distance ourselves from 2010?
I don't believe there was any deception going on here. The foundation was in communications with a "whale" in the Spokane area that definitely has the means to donate to Eastern in exchange for the family's naming rights. The powers that be in the foundation could not get the deal done. There was substantial funds donated for and committed to the design drawings. I believe intentions were good because they were led to believe there was interest in a substantial donation.EWUSigep447 said:
Vic E. Wallace
Active member
To All,
Attended practice yesterday, All was doing sprints, and running. Spoke to some of the recruits, right now, they are all happy they came to EWU. Met Levi Long, Jayson Williams, Malcolm Williams, Sam Inos, Keenan Hlad, Sam Mcpherson. Former Eagle and Dallas Cowboys, Matt Johnson is working with the Players, which will be great for our Corner Backs/D/Backs. Will be back out at 9:15a.m. Vic Wallace
Attended practice yesterday, All was doing sprints, and running. Spoke to some of the recruits, right now, they are all happy they came to EWU. Met Levi Long, Jayson Williams, Malcolm Williams, Sam Inos, Keenan Hlad, Sam Mcpherson. Former Eagle and Dallas Cowboys, Matt Johnson is working with the Players, which will be great for our Corner Backs/D/Backs. Will be back out at 9:15a.m. Vic Wallace
Vic E. Wallace
Active member
To All,
Senior TE transferred from WSU, and WSU, Kicker, now EWU, has a very strong right foot, he has some height and distance when he put his foot on the ball. Vic Wallace
Senior TE transferred from WSU, and WSU, Kicker, now EWU, has a very strong right foot, he has some height and distance when he put his foot on the ball. Vic Wallace
Rontheoldwiseeagle
Active member
Is Matt here for the season or just visiting?? I have not seen any news??Vic E. Wallace said:
