BearCub said:there's no way any decision has been made before Collins interviews. . . that's the classic folly of taking two unconnected things and connecting them and drawing a conclusion.
Yeah, but it's fun! :mrgreen:
BearCub said:there's no way any decision has been made before Collins interviews. . . that's the classic folly of taking two unconnected things and connecting them and drawing a conclusion.
#1bearsfan said:My concern about hiring D2 coaches is that they haven't recruited D1 players. And it's going to take D1 talent to be one of the top teams in the Big Sky. UNC is close to being one of these teams but there's a lot to be gained in terms of getting over the hump by having a coach who's been with a winning program at the FCS level. The last thing UNC needs is another coach learning on the fly. IMO, there are a lot of very talented coaches in this conference and the new head coach at UNC needs to be equal to the McBrides, Ashs, and Baldwins.
jars said:Interesting, O'Boyle is 2-0 against Big Sky teams.
Beardown said:#1bearsfan said:My concern about hiring D2 coaches is that they haven't recruited D1 players. And it's going to take D1 talent to be one of the top teams in the Big Sky. UNC is close to being one of these teams but there's a lot to be gained in terms of getting over the hump by having a coach who's been with a winning program at the FCS level. The last thing UNC needs is another coach learning on the fly. IMO, there are a lot of very talented coaches in this conference and the new head coach at UNC needs to be equal to the McBrides, Ashs, and Baldwins.
That and the fact they don't have the connections FBC and FCS coaches have. That's why Breske and Collins should get the job. Both have recruited in this area and OUTSIDE the region.
Blofeld said:It's starting to feel like Collins might be a nobrainer here... The upside is huge, young, loyalty to the program, head coaching experience and seems to be a stand up character that demands a lot but has the players interest at heart.
Also, I can't believe we can't out pay Alcorn State, nothing against them but the SWAC is reagrded as a conference below the Big Sky in performance level, resources, and opportunity.
http://www.greeleytribune.com/article/20101216/SPORTS/712169969/1012&parentprofile=1010
Let me understand. UNC is 5-35 in five years in the BSC and you say they are close to being one the top teams in the conference? That's about as delusional as it gets.#1bearsfan said:it's going to take D1 talent to be one of the top teams in the Big Sky. UNC is close to being one of these teams
kemajic said:Let me understand. UNC is 5-35 in five years in the BSC and you say they are close to being one the top teams in the conference? That's about as delusional as it gets.#1bearsfan said:it's going to take D1 talent to be one of the top teams in the Big Sky. UNC is close to being one of these teams
#1bearsfan said:kemajic said:Let me understand. UNC is 5-35 in five years in the BSC and you say they are close to being one the top teams in the conference? That's about as delusional as it gets.#1bearsfan said:it's going to take D1 talent to be one of the top teams in the Big Sky. UNC is close to being one of these teams
I was speaking about talent-wise UNC is close not record-wise. This team, this year, came within a few points of knocking off Weber, Eastern Washington and Montana St. As you know, Montana St. and Eastern were and are playoff teams. IMO, it was poor game-day coaching that was responsible for at least two of these losses.