PSUVikings said:Great stat for this game, Hawaii only ran the ball twice yesterday, both times they fumbled. At that pace Woodhead will fumble 30 times next week J/K It may have been UH's 5th string RB but it was a good sign.
BTW Brennan set many records, 1) passing yards in 1 half(416) 2) TD in 1 half(6) and 3) completion's in 1 half(32)
Beardown said:PSUVikings said:Great stat for this game, Hawaii only ran the ball twice yesterday, both times they fumbled. At that pace Woodhead will fumble 30 times next week J/K It may have been UH's 5th string RB but it was a good sign.
BTW Brennan set many records, 1) passing yards in 1 half(416) 2) TD in 1 half(6) and 3) completion's in 1 half(32)
Yeah, sounds like the Vikes have enough problems of their own in the Rose City. I am very disapointed in your loss. You should be contending for the conference title and it's not a good start
PSUVikings said:We have a much easier opponent in UC Davis at home this week.
Beardown said:My prediction for the game: CSC 42, UNC 17. This one won't be close. Woodhead will dominate.
Beardown said:My prediction for the game: CSC 42, UNC 17. This one won't be close. Woodhead will te.
gobears2010 said:Our run defense is vastly improved this season, and is perhaps the strongest facet of our game. Woodhead is good, but one man does not a team make. CSC really doesn't have much else to compliment Woodhead, and overall the Bears are the better team. We won't be overlooking them like Montana State did last year.
From all reports, the 'bows could have named the score - they let off the accelerator so as not to hit 100 and embarrass "the program" any more than they did.gobears2010 said:It seems to me that you don't realize that this is not the same Bears as we saw lsat year. Outside of a couple of returns, we played Hawaii's second and third team, which is a talent level equal to the Big Sky, evenly. Chadron's defense gives up 410 yards per game and their passing game isn't very good at all. The Bears had better win this game or it will be an embarrassment to the program.
UH pulled the starters but that is all they did to get off of the accelerator. They threw the ball 60 times and only rushed 10. They also "went for it" on fourth down four times. Trust me they were trying to score the whole game. The point is that once the starters were out the Bears held their own.From all reports, the 'bows could have named the score - they let off the accelerator so as not to hit 100 and embarrass "the program" any more than they did.[
Not to pick nits, but one of your colleagues said a loss to CSC would embarrass UNC. I hope you are prepared to possibly be disappointed.uncfootballrules said:UH pulled the starters but that is all they did to get off of the accelerator. They threw the ball 60 times and only rushed 10. They also "went for it" on fourth down four times. Trust me they were trying to score the whole game. The point is that once the starters were out the Bears held their own.From all reports, the 'bows could have named the score - they let off the accelerator so as not to hit 100 and embarrass "the program" any more than they did.[
I seriously doubt if your eagles are going to come into Nottingham and have to worry about playing your 2's and 3's against us so as not to "embarass" us.